Laserfiche WebLink
Committee Report <br /> Community and Economic Development <br /> September 12, 1994 <br /> Page 2 <br /> The Committee then reviewed Resolution No. 94-87 which is a five year Personal <br /> Property Tax Abatement request for the property located at 701 West Chippawa Ave. Mr. <br /> Mike Beitzinger reviewed the Memorandum date September 6, 1994 noting that the <br /> petitioner meets all of the Tax Abatement requirements(copy attached).Mr.Robert Walton <br /> made the presentation.He noted that the company is currently located in Monroe,La.The <br /> company has grown 74% in the past twelve months and because their customer base is in <br /> the midwest that they are most interested in loca It wassndicated that the Chippawa Avehes <br /> Project Future spoke on behalf of the company <br /> building is now complete with Reddi-Pac,Inc.coming to the area. <br /> In response to a question raised about the product,a pamphlet including brochures <br /> of the products made was circulated among the Committee Members. Council Member <br /> Luecke praised the company and Council Member Coleman noted that it is within an <br /> enterprise zone. <br /> Following discussion, Council Member Luecke made a motion, seconded by <br /> Council Member Ladewski, that Resolution No. 94-87 be recommended favorably to <br /> Council.The motion passed. <br /> The Committee then reviewed Resolution o at.9 8 8145 ich is which year Personal <br /> Property Tax Abatement request for the property <br /> Mr. Mike Beitzinger reviewed the Memorandum dated July 5, 1994 (copy <br /> attached). Mr. Robert Tezlaff noted that wire chopping is significant portion of the <br /> operation. <br /> Council Member Zakrzewski noted that <br /> hset forth is not <br /> the Scrap land Junk Yard <br /> Resolution No.211-94 which provided a copy licensed. He <br /> of Reso <br /> P <br /> py them. <br /> licenses issued for 1994 by the City of South Bend. The petitioner was not among t e <br /> Mr. Tezlaff noted that he was aware of that and that their petition apparently was before the <br /> Board of Public Works. <br /> The Council attorney indicated that a licenses was a prerequisite for going forward <br /> on the proposed Tax Abatement request. She also questioned the noise levels in light of the <br /> fact that the Tax Abatement petition stated that there would be a significant decrease in light <br /> G, of the new machinery being proposed.Mr. Tezlaff stated that it would significantly reduce <br /> noise levels. <br /> Council Member Luecke questioned the SIC code and Mr. Beitzinger noted that it <br /> was a manufacturing process number. Council Member Luecke stated that it appears in <br /> light of the licensing procedure required to have been completed prior to formal action <br /> being taken by the Council on the Tax Abatement request that the proposed Bill should be <br /> continued until the September 26, 1994 meeting. Council Member Zakrzewski requested <br /> that the noise levels of the new manufacturing a t h Cs <br /> Council by the end of this week. Tezlaff stated that he would comply with that request. <br /> Following discussion, Council Member Luepke made a motion, seconded by <br /> Council Member Ladewski ,that Resolution No. 94-88 be continued until the meeting of <br /> September 26, 1994.The motion passed. <br /> I I <br />