Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Council Member Slavinskas spoke in favor of the proposed 10 <br /> year abatement and stated that he believes it does qualify <br /> for a 10 year abatement because it is a critical development <br /> to the downtown. Council Member Duda also spoke in favor of <br /> an abatement but cautioned with regard to the exceptions. <br /> Council Member Ladewski was concerned over the exception and <br /> noted that several of the renovations being done were in <br /> light of the American With Disabilities Act. <br /> Following further discussion, Council Member Slavinskas made <br /> a motion seconded by Council Member Luecke that Resolution <br /> No. 93-22 be amended in Section IV. and Section V. as <br /> indicated by the Council Attorney, and that it be <br /> recommended favorably to full Council. The motion passed. <br /> Council Member Duda and Council Member Kelly both noted that <br /> since special exceptions are reviewed on a case by case <br /> basis, that they believe that this was fair in light of all <br /> the circumstances. <br /> The Council Attorney then requested the petitioner to have a <br /> Substitute Resolution prepared, for this evening's meeting <br /> incorporating all of the changes recommended by the <br /> Committee. A copy of that Substitute Resolution is <br /> attached. <br /> There being no further business to come before the <br /> Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 4 : 50 p.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Council Member Roland Kelly, Chairperson <br /> Human Resources and Economic Development Committee <br /> attachments <br />