My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
EXHIBIT N- DENIAL of COA BY HPC
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2022
>
07-11-2022
>
McSweeney Appeal Brief & Exhibits
>
EXHIBIT N- DENIAL of COA BY HPC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2022 3:23:02 PM
Creation date
7/7/2022 11:38:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Page | 2 <br /> <br />Commission President Gelfman clarified that, in motions for denial, Commissioners are <br />required to state their reasons for denial. Roll was called. <br />Commissioner Hertel (AYE): I vote to deny the application on the grounds that has been <br />stated that there are other ways and methods that could occur, and this house is rated as <br />outstanding. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brazinsky (AYE): I vote aye for same exact reasons. <br /> <br />Commissioner Andrews (AYE): That makes three of us, I don’t feel like the homeowner <br />has been able to explore all the potential options laid in front of him because he’s been so <br />focused on GreenTree and that has kind of clouded his judgement. I am concerned that his <br />that his child has lead poisoning, this is not the outcome that any of us want but this is what <br />we have been tasked with to do based on the standards and guidelines. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stalheim (AYE): I vote to deny on the grounds that there are other ways to <br />acquire lead remediation. Technically, the house will still have lead in it, it is just <br />encapsulated and it will be an issue later on down the road. This could set a dangerous <br />precedent for historic properties with replacing windows on the basis of lead paint. <br /> <br />Commissioner Downs-Krostenko (AYE): I also voted to deny for the reasons stated during <br />the discussion. During the course of this meeting the discussion is made clear why we have <br />voted the way that we have. <br /> <br />Commissioner Tiffany (AYE): I vote aye because there are other options but in the <br />wellbeing of the child I would like to help with a list of other options. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wyncott (NAY): <br /> <br />Commissioner Gelfman (AYE): I vote aye for the reasons stated from everyone else on the <br />commission, the standards and guidelines and there are other options that can be addressed <br />with this issue. <br /> <br />Certificate of Appropriateness #2022-0223 is denied. <br /> <br /> <br />The Historic Preservation Commission supports the remediation of Lead Based Paints (“LBP”) on locally <br />designated structures. Per the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), Lead abatement can be executed <br />in four ways: encapsulation, enclosure, paint removal, and/or replacement. The application before the <br />Commission was for replacement of six windows; the Commission denied that application. Encapsulation, <br />enclosure, or paint removal projects for the “LBP” on these six windows should be considered. No additional
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.