Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT <br />CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A <br />CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS <br /> <br />Date: June 13, 2022 <br />Application Number: 2022-0518 <br />Property Location: 1133 North Allen Street <br />Historic Name: A. V. Keeney <br />Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Bungalow / 1915 /Ernest <br />Young <br />Property Owner: Norah Amstate, Jesse Amstate <br />Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, #7213-82 <br />Rating: Significant/Contributing <br /> <br /> <br />DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Asymmetrical 1 ½ story bungalow style house poured concrete <br />foundation. Large gabled dormer on front façade of asphalt shingled roof. Exposed rafter tails with decorative <br />ends. First story has clapboard siding transitioning with a flared belt band to shingles on the second story. <br />Windows are 6/1 casements with lip-molded lintels. <br /> <br />ALTERATIONS: COA 1994-0322 allowed for the removal and replacement of the asphalt shingle roof on house <br />and garage. AA 2021-0721 allowed for the removal and replacement of the asphalt shingle roof. <br /> <br />APPLICATION ITEMS: “Adding a wall to the garage to finish it/insulate. In order to convert it into a <br />workshop/artist studio. Sheetrocking garage. Wall will have two windows and a 42” door. Running electricity into <br />the garage from outdoor shutoff box.” <br /> <br />DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The applicant has requested approval to: <br /> <br />Remove overhead door on west façade of the garage and replace with wall consisting of two windows <br />(53.5”x 29” Openings) and a door (42” x 84”). Insulated and finish interior of garage with sheetrock. Run <br />electricity to garage from outdoor shutoff box. <br /> <br />Based upon submitted photographs, the windows appear to be two (2) Pella right hinge casement windows, with <br />what appears to be simulated divided light between the glass. The door is a salvaged three panel door with glazing. <br /> <br />STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: GROUP B <br />The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a <br />historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/ or samples where appropriate. <br />A. MAINTENANCE <br />The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and <br />upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites ( appendix A: Minimum <br />Maintenance Standards). <br />B. TREATMENT <br />Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements <br />include reroofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character <br />of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of <br />Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a <br />Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for <br />character and style consistency with the original surfaces. <br />C. RENOVATION AND ADDITIONS <br />Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A <br />modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). <br />Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples <br />of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall