04-09-90 Zoning & Vacation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Y Y Zoning and Vacation Committee 4-9-90 Page 3 of 4 Mr. Deitrick, one of twelve owners of the Oyster Bar noted that he had contacted several property owners in the area. A petition was circulated with 48 individuals signing the petition in favor of the proposed ordinance in its current form (copy attached) . He then provided maps to the Council indicating existing parking as well as the property owners in favor of the proposed bill. A substitute bill was then circulated to the committee members which was drafted by Deputy City Attorney David Chapleau. Mr. Chapleau noted that it was an attempt to try to satisfy the concerns of the individuals in the area (copy attached) . Mr Gaylen Allsop stated that he is an attorney which represents the Madison Oyster Bar and is one of its owners. He noted that he is excited about the development in this area and spoke in favor of the proposed bill in its current form. He noted that the problem is one of educating the people as to where to park as to opposed to a lack of parking spaces. Council Member Niezgodski questioned Mr. Roberts as to signage for the Madison Center Parking Lot. Mr. Roberts noted that currently there is no prohibition posted. Council Member Dudas suggested that perhaps such signage would help the current situation. Council Member Luecke questioned whether the current parking regulations are stopping development. Mr. Kloefple noted that there are problems related to the Mint Julip Building as well as the Opelika Building and noted that the cost per parking space averages between $5-6000.00. Council Member Luecke stated that perhaps the City should study linked development or a parking tax. Mr. Kloefple noted that parking garages were considered at one point but were ruled out since the benefit is not to all property owners. Council Member Luecke also suggested that impact fees be studies. In response to a question raised by Council Member Luecke, Mr. Hunt noted that the Transpo Trolley concept is still being explored however it appears to be quite costly. He also noted that his department is looking at the improvement district concept and is currently in the data gathering stage. Mr. Hunt stated that they are quite optimistic in this area however his department needs flexibility and further believes that the proposed ordinance is a good first step.