Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Of these two projects, the installation of solar panels would qualify for administrative approval per the proposed <br />location and configuration. The standing seam metal roof constitutes a material change and requires Commission <br />review. The garage is a secondary structure to the main house that currently does not detract from the significance <br />of the property. <br /> <br />The proposed roof change could be interpreted as a “Treatment” change per the Group B Standards, as it would <br />“involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark” but “not alter the style <br />or original form.” This treatment change will alter the appearance of the landmark by replacing the existing asphalt <br />shingles with a standing seam metal roof. The proposed roof change could be considered a “Renovation”, as it is a <br />change that will not be altering the general massing of the landmark. The massing of the garage is remaining the <br />same in relation to the main house. <br /> <br />STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: GROUP B <br />The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, <br />renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/ or <br />samples where appropriate. <br />A. MAINTENANCE <br />The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the <br />general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all <br />structure or sites ( appendix A: Minimum Maintenance Standards). <br />B. TREATMENT <br />Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. <br />Such improvements include reroofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can <br />potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface <br />whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it <br />significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a <br />Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the <br />proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. <br />C. RENOVATION AND ADDITIONS <br />Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a <br />change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under <br />demolition (see demolition). <br />Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover <br />singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt <br />the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures <br />should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: <br />1. Structure—– Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a <br />way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. <br />2. Material— Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same <br />material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it <br />duplicates the original. <br />a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. <br />b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with <br />additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a <br />siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. <br />D. DEMOLITION <br />Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is <br />the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods <br />should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition <br />of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation.