My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-28-13 Agenda & Packet
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Common Council Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
01-28-13 Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2013 11:09:58 AM
Creation date
1/24/2013 11:03:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Area Board of Zoning Appeals—December 5, 2012 <br /> being used as storage and it previously was used as a revival ministry or what not. There's also a rundown <br /> sign on the front of that building also that appears, it has a phone number and it previously said "for lease" <br /> but the sign is so faded and damaged now I can't really tell what it says. And so I took all my paperwork to <br /> the Building Department and expressed my concern that there might be a religious facility next to it,would I <br /> need to apply for a variance or anything of that nature? I looked into it as much as I possibly could to go <br /> about everything in a proper manner. <br /> MR. BULOT: That's something that would have to be verified and that's on you to verify that, <br /> MR. WINDT: Okay, absolutely. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: Questions, comments or is there a motion? Again,that to send it with a favorable <br /> recommendation, with no recommendation or with a negative recommendation. <br /> MR. HAWLEY: I would like to a motion that we send this to the City of South Bend Common Council with <br /> a unfavorable recommendation. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: Do we have a second? <br /> MR. PHIPPS. I'll second that with a comment. Being that this is already zoned Local Business I see that a <br /> good business in a nice building particularly if it was separated from Belmont Street as the staff has <br /> suggested, would be a positive thing for the neighborhood. The question of safety has been raised and I can <br /> understand the neighbors concerns with that but if you ask whether the people who be patronizing this <br /> establishment would be anymore dangerous than a convenient store I would have to say probably not and <br /> there would probably be a lot fewer of them. So I don't know that I could vote against on the safety issue, <br /> but the thing that does bother is that the condition the building appears to be in seems to me will take an <br /> awful of money to get it to a condition that I think it wouldn't be a positive influence on the neighborhood <br /> and that a nice business would be. And I just don't, from what I've heard of the arrangement, I just can't <br /> completely agree with that that would be what happened that this would be developed as it's proposed here. <br /> So I would second the motion. <br /> MR. URBANKSI: We have a motion and a second on the floor to send it to the City of South Bend <br /> Common Council with a unfavorable recommendation. Please call for the vote, <br /> MRS. HENRY: The motion was made by Mr. Hawley and seconded by Mr. Phipps. Mr. Velleman? <br /> MR. VELLEMAN: This is a tough one. Perception is reality and the perception of all the adjacent <br /> homeowners is that this tattoo parlor is going to be a very big detriment to their area which is logically based <br /> off history. You can't base a new person's potential off of what the historic of the certain building was. <br /> However, since that is their perception and their perception is their reality and part of our aid is not to do <br /> injury to anyone around there, I would say yes to this. Just because for that fact. While I don't think with <br /> what I've heard what these gentlemen say about their plans, and Jerry I see what you're saying but that's <br /> 50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.