06-07-89 Human Resources & Economic Development

Home Browse Search

Human Resources and Economic Development Committee June 7, 89 Page 3 Neil Gilbert, a resident and employee of South Bend Heritage Foundation then spoke in favor of the Bill. He noted that the overall plan is based on a comprehensive plan of over 18 months of study and input which has widespread participation. He noted that the general membership had monthly meetings where they reviewed the plan in light of the needs of the neighborhood. The plan suggests reducing the size of the commercial area and expanding the housing area. He noted that there are severaly deteriorated conditions with high vacancy rates, limited demand for commercial space and that the cost of rehabilitation in many instances would be cost prohibited. Eugenia Brayboy noted that she has been a resident of the area for over 26 years and supports the proposed plan. She noted that many years ago the area was safer and that over the years she has watched it deteriorate unnecessarily. She wants to stay in the area because of her age and limited financial resources. She noted that she had attempted to start such a program three years ago, however, that group then merged with the WWCRP. Mrs. Brayboy stated that she believes that the area must be revitalized and that the plan is affordable and very comprehensive. She urged the Council to bring about a dream so that she could live in the area in comfort. Gladys Muhammad stated that she is a resident of the area and an employee of South Bend Heritage. She spoke in favor of the plan and Bill. She noted that in 1986 four persons were killed, in 1987 one was killed, and in 1988 one was killed, all in the 1200 block of West Washington. She stated that this alone underlines the need for help in the area. Mr. Bobbie Newbill spoke in opposition to the Bill. He noted that he was a contractor and that the area in questions should be rehabilitated as oppossed to being demolished. He stated that the recommendations of the WWCRP and the Redevelopment Commission should not be accepted. Mr. Felix Owsley also spoke in opposition to the Bill. He noted that according to his figures the repayment would fall short over a 20 year period by $51, 140. 00. He also noted that the medium income in the area was $11, 000. 00 with the blacks only making 67% of that medium income. He stated that this is a social problem. Mr. David Norris upon questioning noted that each building will be studied with regard to its potential use and decision of its future status. He noted that he had sent a letter to Mr. Owsley addressing acquisition of property and possibly reuse and possible rehab of individual buildings.