Laserfiche WebLink
rrw- <br /> r <br /> QIIITi i� arpnrt <br /> ZONING AND VACATION COMMITTEE <br /> a!o tie Q znnuwn Tomtit of tip nu of*out!! Virtu): <br /> The May 8, 1989 meeting of the Zoning and Vacation Committee <br /> was called to order by its Chair Person Council Member Lee <br /> Slavinskas at 4: 00 p.m. in the Council informal meeting <br /> room. <br /> Persons in attendance included Council Members: Luecke, <br /> Zakrzewski, Niezgodski, Soderberg, Puzzello, Slavinskas, <br /> Voorde, and Coleman; John Leszczynski, Richard Morgan, <br /> Attorney, Bruce Metzger, Al DeFreese, James Wensits, Joseph <br /> and Helen Jenowski, and Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand. <br /> Council Member Slavinskas noted that the first item on the <br /> agenda was to review Bill No. 17-89 which would amend the <br /> zoning ordinance for the property located on the South side <br /> of Wilson Street. <br /> Mr. Richard Morgan, the Attorney for the Petitioner, then <br /> reviewed the proposal entitled "Ashbury Park" . He <br /> introduced Mr. Al DeFreese, the Architect for the <br /> development. It was noted that there would be 12 units <br /> ranging between 2100 to 2300 square feet beginning at <br /> $175, 000. 00 per condominium. The developers are Garden <br /> Homes. The units would front on Wilson Street. It was <br /> noted that the property in question is the old Cole <br /> Associates, Inc. property. A diagram of the proposed <br /> condominium project was then presented to the Committee <br /> (copy attached) . <br /> Council Member Luecke questioned why the "C" designation was <br /> necessary in height and area. Mr. Morgan noted that this <br /> was necessary in order to forgo the side yard requirements. <br /> He then showed the final site P lan to the Committee and <br /> noted that the highest unit would be 28 feet. <br /> Council Member Soderberg questioned screening and it was <br /> noted that many of the mature trees would be saved and that <br /> new trees would be planted for proper screening. <br /> Council Member Coleman noted that there were 2 remonstrators <br /> at the Area Plan Meeting who were concerned over the "C" <br /> designation. He did, however, that the 28 foot requirement <br /> was specifically noted in the final cite plan. The Area <br /> Plan Commission gave this a favorable recommendation at its <br /> meeting of April 18, 1989. <br /> Following further discussion Council Member Soderberg made a <br /> motion seconded by Council Member Co1,eman that Bill No. 17- <br /> 89 be recommended favorably to Council. The motion passed. <br /> REFERRED <br /> PASSED ..�_ <br />