Laserfiche WebLink
Ottintittftrt Erpnr# <br /> HUMAN RESOURCES AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE <br /> �u #lge fdnuunuu Co uw l of tip CV of South fiend: <br /> The July 25, 1988 meeting of the Human Resources and <br /> Economic Development Committee was called to order by its <br /> Chairman Councilman Steve Luecke at 2:45 p.m. in the Council <br /> informal meeting room. <br /> Persons in attendance included Councilmen: Slavinskas, <br /> Luecke, Niezgodski, Duda, and Coleman; Kathy Baumgartner, <br /> Eugenia Schwartz, Ann Kolata, Hedy Robinson, Max Moore, <br /> Ernest Szarwark, Mike Seitz, Mike Dobson, Adam Kristic, <br /> members of the news media, and Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand. <br /> Councilman Luecke noted that he received a letter from the <br /> Hollady Corporation requesting that Bill No. 38-88 which is <br /> requesting an extension of the boundaries of the tax <br /> abatement impact area and Resolution 88-24 which is <br /> requesting real property tax abatement consideration for 614 <br /> North Michigan Street, be continued until the Council <br /> meeting of August 8, 1988. Councilman Luecke noted that <br /> this extension was being requested so that the report from <br /> Center City Associates could be reviewed prior to the review <br /> of the extension request of the tax abatement boundaries. <br /> Discussion then took place with regard to the procedure that <br /> should be followed with regard to the committee for <br /> confirming tax abatement resolutions. The Council Attorney <br /> recommended that in cases where there were no material or <br /> substantial changes from the declaratory resolution (whether <br /> it be for real or personal property tax abatement) , that the <br /> • petitioner need not be present for the committee meeting at <br /> the time of hearing the confirming resolution. However, if <br /> there would be substantial or material changes their <br /> presence would be requested and proper notice issued by the <br /> City Clerk's Office. Discussion took place on this <br /> recommendation. Councilman Coleman then made a motion <br /> seconded by Councilman Slavinskas recommending approval of <br /> the Council Attorney's recommendation. The motion passed. <br /> A question was then raised whether the petitioner's presence <br /> would be needed at the caucus meeting prior to the regular <br /> hearing for a confirmatory resolution. Discussion took <br /> place on this question and it was decided informally by the <br /> Committee that the petitoiner would not have to attend the <br /> causus meeting unless specific notice was given otherwise. <br /> Councilman Luecke noted that the petitioner and legal <br /> counsel for the confirming tax abatement resolutions for Art <br /> Iron were present and then proceeded ahead on Resolution <br /> Number 88-49 which is a confirming resolution for a three- <br /> year real property tax abatement for the property located at <br /> 1020 High Street and Resolution Number 88-50 which was a <br />