08-19-87 Public Safety - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Public Safety Committee Minutes/August 19 , 1987 Page 4 the State law definition of "criminal trespass" , the incorporation of the definition of "fight" utilizing the State law definition, incorporation of a definition for "unprovoked", the reduction of the proposed insurance coverage from $500,000 to $300, 000 , incorporation of the Department of Code Enforcement anywhere that the South Bend Police Department is indicated, the incorporation of a sign stating "Beware, Potentially Dangerous Dog" which would be part of the licensing procedure, additional regulations with regard to pens or structures for such animals, and the incorporation of the concept that ownership of such a dog would be termporarily forfeited if such a dog does cause "serious injury" and that the costs to board the dog pending legal process would be a cost assumed by the dog's owner. In response to questions from Councilman Taylor, Dr. Carol Ecker stated that currently the Humane Society has hired a contractor to construct cement block rooms with ten ( 10) foot ceilings to house potentially dangerous dogs and the American Pit Bull Terrier. She stated that there was an incident at the Humane Society where an American Pit Bull Terrier was able to get out of its cage and attack two ( 2 ) other dogs. She also confirmed that when American Pit Bull Terriers are turned in to the Humane Society , they are not allowed to be adopted and are humanely euthanized. She further stated that although she would prefer not to single out a breed , there is ample evidence to show that these dogs are potentially dangerous due to their fighting nature. She also stated that her staff is very much aware of the characteristics of the American Pit Bull Terrier and could determine these characteristics . Councilman Tom Zakrzewski had a series of questions with regard to the proposed legislation. He specifically questioned whether , in fact , the American Pit Bull Terrier is vicious because of its training or breeding and was told that it was a combination of both. He also had several questions with regard to enforcement . Patricia DeClercq of the Code Enforcement Department stated that the procedure with regard to enforcement would be similar , if not identical to the enforcement of the current animal control legislation. Both Mrs. DeClercq and the Council Attorney emphasized that when there is an alleged ordinance violation such as the dog running at large, the dog would be picked up and taken to the Humane Society. The dog would then be held for the period of time set forth in the ordinance and, if it was not claimed by the owner, it would then be humanely euthanized. The other way that the ordinance could be triggered into effect is if a complaint would be registered by a citizen within the City .