My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-24-87 Zoning & Vacation
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
1987
>
08-24-87 Zoning & Vacation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2013 2:30:16 PM
Creation date
1/18/2013 2:30:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
8/24/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning and Vacation Committee <br /> Minutes/August 24, 1987 <br /> Page 2 <br /> equal protection rights. In this way, persons who were either in <br /> favor or against a variance could have a public forum at which to <br /> present their information. <br /> Councilman Serge questioned what would happen with regard to <br /> those satellite dishes which were currently placed in front yards. <br /> It was noted that so long as they were in place prior to the <br /> effective date of this ordinance, if passed , those situations <br /> would be grandfathered. <br /> Councilman Puzzello also questioned grandfathering, and it <br /> was noted that if a satellite dish remained in a front yard prior <br /> to the effective date of this ordinance , it would continue to be a <br /> legal non-conforming use even with the change of ownership. The <br /> Council Attorney noted, however , that there would not be a <br /> "personal" grandfather clause which was sought by several of the <br /> remonstrators. The grandfathering would not allow a person who <br /> had a modern accouterment in their front yard to then move to a <br /> totally different lot and install that modern accouterment within <br /> the new front yard. However , if a change of ownership occurred <br /> where there was a satellite dish in a front yard prior to the <br /> passage of this ordinance, the new owner of that property could <br /> continue to use that dish as a legal non-conforming use . <br /> Dorothy Jaffe of 1105 North Ironwood stated that she was <br /> married to a ham operator. She noted that ham operators are the <br /> "unsung heroes" in many emergency situations. She indicated that <br /> their service was invaluable during the Special Olympics and <br /> stated that , in her opinion , passage of the ordinance would <br /> interfere with three (3) frequencies utilized by the Civil Defense <br /> and Red Cross . She was also concerned about extra costs involved . <br /> Mr. Brian Strout noted that he is an officer in two (2) of <br /> the clubs for ham operators. He showed examples of several types <br /> of wiring used throughout the City. He voiced concern with regard <br /> to what would happen if a wire utilized by a ham operator was <br /> broken during a storm and whether repair and/or maintenance would <br /> be allowed or whether that individual would be required to appear <br /> before the Board of Zoning Appeals. He estimated that there were <br /> approximately 375 amateur ham radio operators within the city. He <br /> also questioned whether there were height restrictions in effect. <br /> Mr. Wayne Werntz voiced concern with regard to signage and <br /> specifically cited language from a 1985 FCC order which he <br /> believed pre-empted local officials from legislating in this area. <br /> He estimated that there are approximately 2 ,000,000 satellite <br /> dishes nationally and approximately 500,000 amateur ham radio <br /> operators. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.