My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-86 Utilities Committee
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
1986
>
12-08-86 Utilities Committee
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2013 4:09:38 PM
Creation date
1/17/2013 4:09:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
12/8/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> Councilman Barcome questioned how long the 70% increase in rates lasted <br /> and was informed that it was approximately 6 years. He then questioned Mr. <br /> Leszczynski how long the 9% would last and was told it would cover <br /> approximately two years. Council Barcome questioned these facts in further <br /> detail. Mr. Leszczynski added that there would be a zero balance at the end <br /> of this month in the Department. Councilman Serge then questioned whether a <br /> 3% increase in the overall rate increase to residential and commercial users <br /> could be considered as opposed to the 9% increase. Mr. Leszczynski noted <br /> that a 3% increase would generate approximately $180,000 in new revenues and <br /> it would not be sufficient to meet the ongoing costs. He further added that <br /> there are approximately 40,000 customers in the system. <br /> Councilman Beck noted that there political ramifications and the <br /> Council must consider the proposed increase very carefully. <br /> Councilman Paszek noted that he and several other Councilmen had <br /> requested specific figures with regard to cost and revenue projections which <br /> had not been received to date by the Council. Councilman Voorde also voiced <br /> concern in this area. Mr. Leszczynski noted that we would attempt to provide <br /> such information at the time of the caucus meeting later this evening. <br /> Mr. Wensits questioned approximately what percent of the $100,000 to be <br /> generated by the surcharge would be paid by New Energy and was told that <br /> approximately 907 would be coming from the New Energy Corporation. <br /> After further discussion, Councilman Barcome made a motion seconded by <br /> Councilman Beck that no recommendation be given to Bill No. 134-86 <br /> substitute version. The motion passed. <br /> There being no further business for the Committee the meeting was <br /> adjourned at 4:45 p.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Joseph Serge, Chairman <br /> -3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.