01-27-86 Zoning & Vacation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning & Vacation minutes January 27 , 1986 Page 2 Mr. Chuck Sausman basically reviewed the petition. He noted that the property is currenly vacant and that a twenty-four (24) hour operation (commonly known as a 7- 11 store) would be developed in the proposed area. He noted that there would be attractive screening and that all deliveries would take place in the front of the building. It was further noted that a setback variance had been approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals and that Mr. Panzica would handle all architectural renderings. Councilman Paszek noted concern over the filling station aspect of the proposed 7-11 development. Councilman Beck noted that no remonstrators had contacted her. It was also noted that Area Plan sent a favorable recommendation on the proposed project . Following discussion by the Committee, Councilman Puzzello made a motion, seconded by Councilman Beck, to recommend Bill No. 2-86 favorably to Council . The motion passed . Councilman Voorde noted that there were no presenters present at the Committee meeting for Bill No. 170-85 which was a bill to vacate property commonly known as the first east-west alley south of Delaware Street running east from Olive Street to Phillipa. In light of that , no recommendation could be made by the Committee . The Committee then reviewed Bill No. 132-85 which was a bill to vacate the property commonly known as the first north-south alley west of Laurel Street running from Western Avenue to Napier excepting the intersecting east-west fourteen (14) foot alley for a distance of 243.56 feet , more or less , all being on Willets Subdivision of B.O.L. 89 and Deardoff's Subdivision of B.O.L. 90 and lying between Lots 1 and 10 of Lots 6 and 15 respectively. Councilman Beck spoke on the proposed bill . The Board of Public Works made a favorable recommendation with regard to the entire alley . It was noted , however , that if the legal description would be amended, the ordinance would have to go back to the Board of Public Works for a new review and recommendation and be reported back to the Common Council. Following discussion by the Committee, Councilman Beck made a motion, seconded by Councilman Puzzello, that Bill No. 132-85 be continued until the February 24, 1986 meeting of the Common Council . The motion passed.