Laserfiche WebLink
BILL NO. 22-06 <br />RESOLUTION NO. ______________ <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF SOUTH BEND DESIGNATING CERTAIN AREAS WITHIN <br />THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, COMMONLY KNOWN AS <br />INTERSECTION OF CALVERT STREET AND RENEWABLE DRIVE, SOUTH BEND <br />IN 46613 AN ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AREA FOR PURPOSES OF A (5) FIVE- <br />YEAR PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT FOR JEM FARMS SOUTH BEND, <br />LLC <br />WHEREAS, a petition for personal property tax abatement consideration has been filed with <br />the City Clerk for consideration by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, <br />requesting that the area commonly known as an intersection of Calvert Street and Renewable Drive, <br />South Bend IN 46613, and which is more particularly described as follows: <br />Business Personal Property <br />and which has Key Numbers to be assigned, be designated as an Economic Revitalization Area <br />under the provisions of Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1 et seq., and South Bend Municipal Code Sections 2- <br />76 et seq., and; <br />WHEREAS, the Department of Community Investment has concluded an investigation and <br />prepared a report with information sufficient for the Common Council to determine that the area <br />qualifies as an Economic Revitalization Area under Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1, et seq., and South <br />Bend Municipal Code Sections 2-76, et seq., and has further prepared maps and plats showing the <br />boundaries and such other information regarding the area in question as required by law; and <br />WHEREAS, the Community Investment Committee of the Common Council has reviewed <br />said report and recommended to the Common Council that the area qualifies as an Economic <br />Revitalization Area. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South <br />Bend, Indiana, as follows: <br />SECTION I. The Common Council hereby determines and finds pursuant to Indiana Code 6-1.1- <br />12.1-4.5 et seq., that: <br />a.The estimate of the cost of the new logistical distribution equipment including but <br />not limited to conveyors, scanning and moving equipment, packaging equipment, <br />sorting and picking equipment is reasonable for equipment of that type; <br />b.That the estimate of the number of individuals that will be employed or whose <br />employment will be retained by the Petitioner can reasonably be expected to result <br />from the proposed installation of new logistical distribution equipment; <br />c.That the estimate of the annual salaries of those individuals that will be employed or <br />whose employment will be retained by the Petitioner can be reasonably expected to