Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2. <br /> Personnel and Finance Committee <br /> rates were not being properly evaluated. Councilman Zakrzewski <br /> questioned why the Line Item for the collection attorney, part of <br /> the services contractural amount in Line Item 299 was proposed at <br /> a $5, 700 increase. It was noted that due to the increase in rates <br /> the City was was taking a more agressive enforcement procedure. <br /> It was also noted that the three Board members compensation is also <br /> budgeted in this account. The Board formally meets on the first <br /> and third Monday of each month plus has individual meetings with . <br /> Mr. Jacobs. Its ' members included: Wally Gartee, Mrs. Earles, and <br /> Mr. Kromkowski. <br /> The Water Works General Fund for 1985 is proposed at a 1% <br /> increase for a total of $4,490,633. <br /> Water Works Depreciation Fund page 67 <br /> The 1985 Water Works Depreciation Fund is proposed at <br /> $473, 800. It was noted that the cost center total listing $800,300 <br /> for a 6% increase should be amended to the $473,800 figure. <br /> Line. Item 382 "Advanced Tap Refunds" is maintained since <br /> there are sill a few watermains requiring this It was also noted <br /> that operations like Chemlawn fill their tanks on a permit basis <br /> with the. City. <br /> Councilman Zakrzewski noted that several Line Items in their <br /> total amounts differ in the worksheets when compared to the budget <br /> page. Mr. Leszczynski noted that the following amendments should <br /> be made to the amounts listed on page. 67: <br /> 363 Equipment Repair $ 93, 000 <br /> Total 0300 $ 95 ,000 <br /> 416 Bldgs. ,Str. , Improvement $120,000 <br /> 427 Motor Equipment $ 49,300 <br /> 429 Other Equipment $ 30,000 <br /> Total 0400 $378,800 <br /> Cost Center Total $473,800 <br /> All other amounts listed on page 67 would remain as printed. <br /> Mr. Leszczynski noted that much_ of the contamination at the <br /> well field was being eliminated and that between 4-6 wells would be <br /> in operation in the near future. The process is taking longer <br /> than initially anticipated. It was also noted in response to <br /> Councilman Crone' s question that the cost of automation would be <br /> one time items. <br />