My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-30-81 Human Resources & Economic Development
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
1981
>
11-30-81 Human Resources & Economic Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2013 1:39:27 PM
Creation date
1/16/2013 1:39:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
project. City wanted time for legal staff review. October 5, <br /> the meeting was attended by Chuck Lahey, Dave Vance, Bob Raker, <br /> Pat McMahon, Rich Hill, Kevin Horton, for the City to scrap the <br /> $50 ,000.00 offer and does not like the legal mechanism. McMahon <br /> says we must get this project dissolved, also no legally binding <br /> contracts have been signed, so we have failed to comply with the <br /> original agreement. McMahon again informed that we could not <br /> sign legally binding sales agreements for the building which we <br /> did not have. Legals must be drawn up for size of condo required. <br /> October 8, Vance meets with Horton and McMahon for additional <br /> time and $100 ,000.00. October 21, Vance meets with McMahon, and <br /> McMahon says that two other developers are waiting to negotiate <br /> the building. October 27 Lahey meets with Horton and Horton <br /> informs them of funding and asks them for funding and asks for <br /> more time to finance long term funds. Okay given by McMahon. <br /> Warner Mortgage had received project and they had come back to us <br /> with a proposal on payment schedules, and were very interested in <br /> the project. They had come back to us with a proposal on rate, <br /> payment schedule and they were very interested in the project. <br /> October 29, Bob Lackey from TRISCO Systems Inc. , Lima, Ohio called <br /> Kevin Horton and Kevin Horton tells Lackey that financing failed <br /> and that all negotiations are terminated. Apparently somewhere <br /> here he said he had a contract signed with TRISCO signed to begin <br /> the exterior work. October 30, Lahey and Raker meet in Niles, <br /> Michigan with Pacesetter Bank to set them up with Baird & Warner <br /> out of Chicago. The same day, Channel 28 held a Press Release <br /> and stated that all developers on Odd Fellows Building have failed <br /> and the building will probably be torn down. The president of <br /> TRISCO was in town and heard that release. November 2, Horton <br /> tells Lahey that no call has been made yet and has no knowledge <br /> of press release. Bob Plackey informs me (Raker) of a conversation <br /> with Kevin Horton on the 29th. Apparently at that time Plackey <br /> was told that the project had failed and the building was down <br /> and that was his first impression that the building had fallen <br /> through. Raker calles Mike Lynch at Baird & Warner mortgage in <br /> Chicago and said that we have a political football here and his <br /> company did not want to be involved until it was straightened <br /> out. Plackey informs me of a conversation that Kevin Horton and <br /> also somewhere between July and August numerous meetings were <br /> held by Redevelopment. Redevelopment tells us $200,000.00 was <br /> not available to them. This was made in athe presence of Mr. <br /> Raker 's attorneys. I was somewhat informed of Mr. Raker 's troubles <br /> this summer so some of this can be taken with a grain of salt. <br /> We are not involved with administrative guidelines but the only <br /> thing that aroused my curiosity was the fact that the $200,000.00 <br /> from the Community Development program with a low interest loan <br /> was not available to them. They referred to it as a federal <br /> grant and that it had expired. <br /> Mr. McMahon: The $200,000 was presented to them the same as it <br /> was to everyone else. Some chose to utilize it and some chose <br /> not to utilize it, and we informed them that the use of the $200,000 <br /> (through a meeting with Mr. Horton and Mr. Lahey) and Mr. Raker <br /> stated that the use of the $200,000 to the extent that you wanted <br /> to utilize that fund and the manner that you wanted to repay it <br /> was one of the factors we used to weight the proposals that were <br /> evaluated. Quite frankly, some of the proposals that we saw <br /> chose not to utilize the $200,000 because they didn't care for <br /> the connection with the City that goes along with it and the <br /> possible tie with Historical Preservation or any type of historical <br /> intervention. We indicated to them that it was something that <br /> would be one of the points that would need review. <br /> Mr. Horton: The point that was made was that they really didn' t <br /> need the $200,000 anyway. If you look at the pro forma they <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.