Laserfiche WebLink
resident of Portage Township, Mr. Tiffany was not truthful. The implications, however, <br />go far beyond that. <br />As an acting officer for the City of South Bend on the Historical Preservation <br />Commission, issuing a ruling on the Chapin Park LHD, Mr. Tiffany was constitutionally <br />required to be a resident of Portage Township, site of the District. <br />The text of Article 6, Section 6 states that "All town officers shall reside in their <br />respective... townships". Since Mr. Tiffany did not reside in Portage Township at the <br />time of his vote, the entire Commission's ruling must be overturned. Mr. Tiffany, and the <br />Historic Preservation Commission, acting under color of law, actively attempted to <br />deprive Mr. Flathers of his Constitutional rights. The Commission's attorney, Ms. <br />Kennedy, in seeking to stop the Appellant from posing a fundamental Constitutional <br />inquiry, also tried to interfere actively with his right to know whether or not <br />commissioners were constitutionally seated to adjudicate the COA. <br />CAUSE OF ACTION #2 <br />The second Constitutional trespass by the HPC is on Amendment 14, the "Equal <br />Protection Clause" to the United States' Constitution. Said Amendment, Section 1 reads, <br />inter alia: <br />"No State shall... deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of <br />law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of laws. " <br />In his presentation of the Commission, September 20, 2021, Appellant supplied a sheaf <br />of 8 x 10 glossy photos of homes within the Chapin Park LHD, all of which had vinyl - <br />clad windows. Appellant and his wife had walked along the sidewalks of Leland and <br />Ashland Streets, as a sample of the area. They took photos of several homes within a <br />one block radius, Appellant later presented 17 such photos to the Commission during <br />his testimony (Collectively, EXHIBIT 3) <br />Commissioner Downs-Krostenko stated that all the homes in Appellant group of photos <br />had their vinyl -clad windows installed prior to the formation of the Chapin Park LHD. <br />The district was established in 2005. By extension, the Commissioner implied that all of <br />the vinyl -clad windows in the photos were legal and thus "grandfathered in." <br />An absolute majority of homes in the sample had vinyl -clad windows. Appellant noted <br />that, and wrote comments discussing the issue of curb -appeal, and historic preservation. <br />Appellant expressed the opinion that the retrofitted homes were more attractive, energy <br />efficient, and more likely to last durably as exemplars of historical preservation. <br />