Laserfiche WebLink
5. f� <br />'uesday December llth, 1906. <br />The Board met in regular session at 10 A. M. Mr. McTnerny absent. <br />Remonstrance filed by Chas Ream et al against the Broadway Street Brick Pavement. <br />Acting President. <br />SPECIAL SESSION TUESDAY EVENING DECEMBER 11TH, 1906, AT 7:15 P. M. <br />The Board met in Special Session at 7:15 P. M. All members present, <br />I <br />Remonstrance filed by Catherine Kent against the North Taylor street Brick Pavement. <br />Remonstrance filed against the Cedar Street Pipe Sewer. <br />Assessment Rolls for <br />Hearing on North Taylor street Brick Pavement, Cedar Street Pipe Sewer and <br />Ford street Grale, Curb & Walk, under Improvement Resolutions Nos-393,337 & 397 resp <br />deferred until Friday December 14th, 1906, at 10 A. M. <br />Hearing given on Assessment Rolls and final estimates for Brick Pavement on Bronson <br />& Marietta street from Vistula avenue to Sample street, Brick Pavement on Perkins street <br />from Chapin street to Laurel street; Brick Pavement on Alley South of Wayne street from <br />Main street to Lafayette street; Brick Pavevement on Coquillard School Alleys; Brick <br />Pavement on Alley South of Colfax avenue from Lafayette to William street, Cement Walk <br />& Curb on Parry street from Division street to Eddy street, Pipe Sewer on Sherman avenue <br />from Van Buren street to Portage avenue, Grade. -Curb & Walk on Laurel street from Divisi- <br />on street to Perkins street, Pipe Sewer on St. Louis & Miner street from South Bend ave <br />to St. Peter street; Pipe Sewer on Ford street from Chapin street to Scott street. All <br />under Improvement Resolutions Nos. 340, 3702 3912 395, 396, 3362 375, 379, 395 <br />& 386 respectively. <br />In the above improvements no remonstrators appeared and no remonstrances were viled <br />The Board therefore find that the property assessed in said rolls filed November 27 <br />1906, is benefitted in the amount of assessments as shown on said rolls and the Board <br />further find that the p,ssessment rolls filed November 27th, 1906, and the final estimate <br />allowed November 27th, 1906, should be and the same in hereby in all things ratified, <br />confirmed and approved. <br />