Laserfiche WebLink
Application for Certificate of Appropriateness <br />Robert and Lucy Jones – 411 W. North Shore Drive, South Bend <br /> <br />Detailed Project Description <br /> <br />Consistent with the City of South Bend’s policy to promote rooftop solar energy, we propose to <br />install 20 all-black solar panels on the south-facing portion of our roof, which is a standard <br />shingle roof. Before installing the panels, we will replace the roof with black shingles so that the <br />solar panels will blend as nearly as possible with the surface of the roof. The panels will be <br />installed in a neat rectangle, flat against the roof surface, and centered on the roof. In order to <br />accommodate that configuration, we will move a vent stack from the front center of the roof to <br />the far right side of the roof, where it will not interfere with the panels. Windfree Solar from <br />Chicago will install the panels. Gean Roofing will install the new roof. Niezgodski Plumbing <br />will move the vent stack to a position on the roof that will not interfere with the solar panels. <br /> <br />We recognize that installing solar panels on the street -facing portion of a roof in a historic <br />district is unusual. We obtained a satellite analysis of our roof surfaces from Eagle View and <br />then consulted with installers, who informed us that the street -facing portion of our roof, which <br />faces south-southwest, is the only feasible portion of our roof for solar panels. We then took <br />great care to design an installation that would be as consistent with the style of our house, and as <br />unobtrusive, as possible. <br /> <br />We explored a variety of options. The approach we are proposing is the most aesthetically <br />pleasing we could develop, but not the least expensive. We will incur extra costs by installing a <br />new roof that will blend with the solar panels, by choosing more costly, all-black solar panels <br />instead of standard panels, and by moving the vent stack in our roof to allow a more symmetrical <br />arrangement of the panels. We have also compromised the total number of panels for the sake of <br />aesthetics. While the roof would accommodate 22 panels, and we would prefer to install that <br />number, we have reduced the proposal to 20 panels so that we can achieve a more symmetrical <br />design. We are willing to incur those extra costs and compromise the number of panels in <br />recognition of our location in a historic district. <br /> <br />We explored the possibility of solar shingles but learned that option is not feasible. We sought <br />bids through EnergySage, a marketplace created by the U.S. Department of Energy and staffed <br />by independent solar energy advisors. EnergySage distributes requests for proposals to <br />approximately 3,000 installers nationwide. We specifically requested proposals for solar <br />shingles. We were informed by installers and by the independent experts at EnergySage that <br />solar shingles are not readily available and are not yet ready for prime time. Just to make sure of <br />that, we directly contacted a solar shingle manufacturer in Michigan and spoke with the CEO. He <br />offered to sell us shingles – at a far higher cost than solar panels -- but was not able to install <br />them or identify an installer who is familiar with them. And the shingles were designed for a <br />Bermuda-style roof, which is not consistent with the style of our home. In the end, it was clear to <br />us that the black solar panels proposed by Windfree Solar would be the most attractive, as well <br />as the most tried-and-true, option for our home. <br /> <br />