My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Alley Vacation - 436 S. Brookfield St.
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Board of Works Documents
>
2021
>
Vacations
>
Alley Vacation - 436 S. Brookfield St.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2021 4:09:47 PM
Creation date
9/28/2021 4:09:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Vacations
Document Date
9/28/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />DATE: August 13, 2021 <br />TO: Matt Longfellow, Public Works <br />Chris Dressel, Community Investment <br />Gerard Ellis, Fire Department <br />Brad Rohrscheib, Police Department <br />FROM: Anne Fuchs, Clerk (afuchs@southbendin.gov) <br />SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR RECOMMENDATIONS – ALLEY VACATION <br />APPLICANT: Zoila Morocho <br />LOCATION: 436 S. Brookfield Street <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PLEASE INSERT YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE APPROPRIATE FIELD BELOW, BASED <br />ON THE FOLLOWING I.C. 36-7-3-13 CRITERIA: <br />1.The vacation would/would not hinder the growth or orderly development of the unit or neighborhood <br />in which it is located or to which it is contiguous. <br />2.The vacation would/would not make access to the lands of the aggrieved person by means of public <br />way difficult or inconvenient. <br />3. The vacation would/would not hinder the public’s access to a church, school or other public building <br />or place. <br />4.The vacation would/would not hinder the use of a public right-of-way by the neighborhood in which <br />it is located or to which it is contiguous. <br />PUBLIC WORKS: No objections, pending the applicant agrees to hire a bonded contractor, that <br />obtains a permit from Engineering, to tear out the alley approach and replace the curb. They <br />may not utilize the vacated alley as a driveway because it would be splitting two properties. <br />Access to the garage in the back of the house would only be able to be accessed via the <br />North/South alley. <br />COMMUNITY INVESTMENT: <br />Unfavorable <br />1. The vacation would not hinder the growth or orderly development of the unit or neighborhood <br />in which it is located or to which it is contiguous. <br />2. The vacation would make access to the lands of the aggrieved person by means of public <br />way difficult or inconvenient. <br />3. The vacation would not hinder the public’s access to a church, school or other public <br />building or place. <br />4. The vacation would hinder the use of a public right-of-way by the neighborhood in which it is <br />located or to which it is contiguous. <br />Note: The subdivision ordinance requires a mid-block connection for any lot of 600’ or greater. <br />This block is greater than 600’, so the mid-block connection should be retained.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.