My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-05-12 Health & Public Safety and Zoning & Annexation
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2012
>
12-05-12 Health & Public Safety and Zoning & Annexation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2013 2:45:12 PM
Creation date
1/9/2013 2:45:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
12/5/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Scott Palmer led a group of ten advocates. He related a story of an upscale Indianapolis <br /> neighborhood that had gone from opposition to support for the chickens citing sustainable <br /> living rationales. Scott also described"Naptown Co-Op"fostered in 17 Indianapolis <br /> schools. He said the City of Cleveland which recently passed a measure like Bill No. 74- <br /> 11 now had 40 permits. <br /> Susan Gruetman spoke to allay nuisance concerns by pointing to set-backs, cleaning <br /> requirements and limits of 6 chickens in the bill. <br /> Brian Hoover tried to alleviate health concerns by citing a report form the Center for <br /> Disease Control (CDC) which said chicken coops pose no greater disease threat than <br /> found keeping other pets. <br /> Karen Coman described the educational focus of the South Bend Urban Chicken Alliance <br /> which was formed to help the city administer the bill. She said the City of Bloomington, <br /> Indiana has had a similar bill since 2005. <br /> Miles Robertson spoke to social & environmental issues focusing on animal welfare. He <br /> described the positive economic social and environmental benefits of the practice. <br /> Delia Wilson, Joe, Rose and Maggie Coman all cited healthy food benefits. <br /> Three people spoke in opposition John Brady, a realtor, said there would be a negative <br /> influence on the value of adjacent properties. He suggested raising chickens on public <br /> property. He also said Fort Wayne had rejected the idea due to concerns of water runoff. <br /> Professor Hudak cited concerns including noise, smells, and disease. <br /> Jill St. John expressed the same concerns wondering if the bill opened the door to keep <br /> other animals like ducks or goats. <br /> Oliver allowed advocates a rebuttal. <br /> Susan Gruetman and Scott Palmer both considered disease concerns unfounded. <br /> Turning to Council comments Oliver Davis and Tim Scott asked Cathy Toppel, head of <br /> NCE,her opinion. She said the Urban Chicken Alliance was very cooperative that the <br /> enforcement would be complaint based and that a"neighbor waiver"provision would be <br /> too cumbersome. Tim Scott said Gavin Ferlic's support was dependent on some type of <br /> "neighbor waiver" system. Derek Dieter who expressed support for the bill said a waiver <br /> system was unnecessarily complicating. Henry Davis a strong supporter of the bill, <br /> wanted the bill to pass without creating delays prompted by endless "what ifs." Oliver <br /> Davis suggested consideration of only certain areas where chickens would be allowed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.