Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Zoning and Annexation Committee <br /> March 8,2004 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Council Member Coleman noted that the new zoning ordinance will be in place in the <br /> "very near future"and that it is his understanding that none of the amendments being proposed <br /> by the Area Plan staff affect this area. He noted that Mr. Lee on California Avenue was faced <br /> with a similar situation. Council Member Coleman stated that he believes that the new ordinance <br /> may accommodate the situation. <br /> In response to Mr. Hughes' question, it was noted that proof of a legal non-conforming <br /> use included tax records,tax papers for assessment and city directory information showing a <br /> double address. <br /> City Clerk John Voorde noted that the Assessor's Office has records from 1949, 1962 to <br /> 1968, and recommended that the petitioner could access information on the property through the <br /> township assessor's office. <br /> The Council Attorney noted that the Council has ninety(90)days from the Area Plan <br /> Commission's action to take action on this substitute bill. <br /> Following discussion, Council Member Coleman made a motion, seconded by Council <br /> Member Kelly that Substitute Bill No.3-04 be continued until the April 26th Council meeting, at <br /> the request of the petitioner,Mr. Hughes. The motion passed. <br /> Council Member Kuspa then called for a presentation on Bill No. 13-04 which is a <br /> zoning request for the property commonly known as 508-536 Crescent Avenue. <br /> The Council Attorney noted that she had discussions with the Area Plan Staff and <br /> because Bill No. 13-04 would correct a scrivener's error in the legal description it was <br /> determined that the petitioner would not have to file an ordinance which would be sent to the <br /> Area Plan Commission and then back to the Common Council. <br /> Mr. Richard J. Deahl, a local attorney made the presentation. He stated that after the <br /> Common Council passed a prior ordinance on the same property on February 9th, a scrivener's <br /> error was found in the legal description. The proposed ordinance correct the legal description. <br /> Council Member Coleman made a motion, seconded by Council Member Kelly that Bill <br /> No. 13-04 be recommended favorably to Council. The motion passed. <br /> Council Member Kuspa then called for a presentation on Bill No. 04-29 which would <br /> approve a petition of the South Bend Board of Zoning Appeals for the property located at <br /> 1020/1022 S. Webster. <br /> Building Commissioner Don Fozo stated that the Board of Zoning Appeals sends the <br /> petition to the Council without recommendation. Mr. Fozo rioted that since the BZA meeting the <br /> 'Wig/ <br />