My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-04 Zoning & Annexation
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2004
>
03-22-04 Zoning & Annexation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2013 2:37:18 PM
Creation date
1/9/2013 2:37:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
3/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Attorney John Lloyd representing Richard Brothers of 401 West Sample Street located <br /> behind the subject property stated that the petition should be appropriately changed to reflect that <br /> this should be designated as a Junoll petition and not a BZA petition. He also added that whether <br /> the entity is a transfer station is best addressed by IDEM: Whenever debris is moved from one <br /> container to another it constitutes a transfer station,however,the arrangement as described here is <br /> "murky." IDEM also has preemptive rights,and where its authority exists,local government has no <br /> jurisdiction. <br /> Council Member Varner stated that this is an industrial site surrounded by industrial uses and <br /> in the interest of keeping this industry viable,the owners.should do whatever is necessary to assure <br /> that the business activity will not constitute a "transfer station" subject to IDEM or other City <br /> regulation. He noted that if this petition is approved the area becomes productive,but if not,it could <br /> remain vacant for years. He urged the Council to "work proactively" to solve the problem. <br /> Council Member Coleman stated that he was uncomfortable with many of the problems <br /> described, particularly the blowing of trash overnight. Council Member.Coleman also thought it <br /> might be appropriate to have IDEM weigh in on the issue of whether this did or did not constitute <br /> a transfer station. The Council discussed the necessity of including as a condition to any approval <br /> of the Bill that the containers be covered overnight as well as other conditions. A discussion ensued <br /> as to the appropriate method of securing an opinion or review by IDEM. Attorney Walz stated that <br /> he spoke with Steve Schaffer at IDEM who verbally advised Mr. Walz that if this business is not <br /> transferring material from one container to another, it would not fall within IDEM's jurisdiction. <br /> It was moved and seconded that Bill No.04-29 be approved if amended to contain the <br /> following conditions: <br /> 1. That the containers be covered in accordance with appropriate regulations to prevent <br /> blowing and scattering of contents; <br /> 2. That the containers be removed from the premises within 24 hours except for weekends <br /> when the containers would be removed within forty eight(48)hours; <br /> 3. That there shall be no transfer of materials between containers; and <br /> 4. That there be written review by IDEM confirming that the business activity as described <br /> does not fall within regulatory jurisdiction of IDEM. <br /> The Motion was unanimously approved by the Committee. <br /> C. Miscellaneous Matters <br /> Mr. Jim Frick,President of the South Gateway Association,requested Council support for <br /> a remonstrance against the renewal of the Glo-Worm Liquor.Permit. Mr.Frick stated that the Local <br /> Alcoholic Beverage Board would meet Wednesday,March 24,2004 to determine whether the Glo- <br /> Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.