My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-10-03 Public Works & Property Vacation
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2003
>
11-10-03 Public Works & Property Vacation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2013 3:59:01 PM
Creation date
1/7/2013 3:52:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
11/10/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Public Works and Property Vacation Committee <br /> November 10, 2003 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Ms. Greene stated that TIF bonds will also be involved. She added that none of the agreements are <br /> in final form and that she believes that they should not be given to the Council at this point since <br /> they are still being negotiated. She anticipates that the MOU will be completed later this week. <br /> Council President White inquired about the two (2) homes which may be involved. Ms. Greene <br /> stated that one is independent and that old Planned Parenthood building will be moved. It was <br /> noted that three of the Studebaker Board Members were present. <br /> Council Member Kirsits asked if there would be one admission fee. It was noted that this would <br /> be a staff level decision. <br /> Dr.Varner noted that there are many lose-ends for a building which will be ongoing for the next <br /> 30-40 years. He noted that the costs of operations catches up with you, not the costs of the <br /> Y 1� p Y <br /> building itself. He voiced concern that much of this seems premature, noting that costs of <br /> operations may be $200,000 or as high as $600,000. He stated that at the present time there is not <br /> enough information made available to know the City's risk. Dr. Varner noted that the city should <br /> know where they are going and the costs associated with it. Dr. Varner inquired about what the <br /> County's obligation would be. <br /> Mayor Luecke stated that a business plan was presented to the Council which sets forth a wealth of <br /> information, <br /> Dr. Varner noted that the ERA of 1994 study was "terribly flawed" when it came to the College <br /> Football Hall of Fame,and when it was mentioned in the business plan it raised a"red flag". <br /> Dr. Varner thanked everyone for their update and asked that the Council be updated. <br /> Dr. Varner then asked for an update on the proposed demolition of St. Joseph/Jefferson Street <br /> Parking Garage. <br /> City Engineer Carl Littrell made the presentation. He noted that originally the cost to rehab both <br /> garages was estimated to be $4.2 million. The garages were built in 1970 and opened in 1971, <br /> with both being the first generation of pre-stressed concrete with post tension wires. <br /> In the Spring of 2003 a consultant was hired to follow-up on the 1993 study on the garages. The <br /> latest study shows that many of the pre-stressed tendons are broken. He noted that the garages <br /> were constructed of light-weight concrete which was very porous. During the 1980's <br /> rehabilitation to both garages took place. The Jefferson garage is used more and has more traffic. <br /> The Jefferson garage does not meet the strength test due to flaws in construction and aging. As a <br /> result the 3rd, 6th and 7th levels have been closed which effectively closes the 4th and 5th floors <br /> also. Only the 1st and 2nd floors are currently open. All parkers have been accommodated in other <br /> parking garages and the city is paying the costs for such parkers in the first month. <br /> Mr. Littrell stated that the prognosis for the Jefferson garage is "grim". The cost to rehab is $3.1 <br /> million, but they cannot save the slabs, with the cost to rehab being more than the cost of a new <br /> garage. They propose that in early 2004 that the Jefferson garage be demolished, with the area <br /> being used for surface parking as a "stop gap measure". A study of downtown parking needs <br /> shows that there is currently a surplus. The best site will be reviewed and the study is still <br /> ongoing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.