Laserfiche WebLink
Rr -� <br /> tommttt ort: <br /> + tttittti z Connitittet <br /> The June 10, 2002 meeting of the Utilities Committee was called to order by its Chairperson, <br /> Council Member Al`Buddy"Kirsits at 5:10 p.m. in the Council Informal Meeting Room. <br /> Persons in attendance included Council Members Aranowski, Pfeifer, Varner, Coleman, King, <br /> White, Ujdak, Kirsits and Kelly; Assistant City Attorney Aladean DeRose, Kathy Cekanski <br /> Farrand, Council Attorney,and Terry Bland of the g lttd) $tflti lErribltUt. <br /> Council Member Kirsits noted that the first item on the agenda was to review Bill No. 39-02 which <br /> would correct certain omissions in Ordinance No. 9179-00 addressing Utility Services and would <br /> address costs to the recently annexed area located along US 31 South and Main Street in Centre <br /> Township. <br /> Aladean DeRose made the presentation. She noted that the ordinance addresses the water and <br /> sewer main line installation construction charges which applied to the US 31 South-Phase I project <br /> which was passed on November 27, 2000. That ordinance did not include the cap on residential <br /> sewer and water main line installation charges of$2,000 for water line installation and $3,000 for <br /> sewer line installation. The rate caps are part of the cost sharing for municipal utility line <br /> extensions. <br /> Following discussion, Council Member Coleman made a motion, seconded by Council Member <br /> White that Bill No. 39-02 be recommended favorably to Council. The motion passed. <br /> Under miscellaneous business, Dr. Varner voiced concern about the proposed Bill No. 43-02 <br /> which addresses new sewer rates for customers both in and outside of the city. <br /> Dr. Varner stated that many items must be reviewed by the Council, and that much more than just <br /> the report is necessary. He noted that the proposal is unique in that it is proposing a base rate with <br /> the water and sewer charge than added on top of the base rate. South Bend Community Schools <br /> may be one of the customers most affected with a 57% increase. Since the sewer rate does not <br /> need IURC approval, he suggested that as much information be reviewed as possible. <br /> Following discussion, Dr. Varner requested that the following information be provided to the <br /> Council by the time that the Council packets are ready for the next Council meeting(June 19th): <br /> 1. A copy of the study for each Council Member, the City Clerk and the Council Attorney. <br /> 2. General revenue for the sewage works for the past five(5) years <br /> 3. The number of customers and the breakdown by types <br /> 4. The top ten (10) industrial and the top ten (10) commercial users, and the top ten (10) <br /> users in each category. <br /> 5. A listing of what customers will be most affected with examples of the base rate and the <br /> water and sewer charge compared to the current policies. <br /> Council Member Pfeifer noted that South Bend has an aging population and that the Council needs <br /> to know how the proposed rate increase will affect the residents. She then requested the following <br />