My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-13-08 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
06-13-08 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2008 5:11:21 PM
Creation date
6/25/2008 4:45:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Special Meeting -June 13, 2008 <br />7. PROGRESS REPORTS (CONT.) <br />Mr. King noted that Mr. Wolfson was complaining <br />about the fact that the resolution isn't posted on the <br />Web site for public review. That is a legitimate <br />complaint. Mr. King felt there needed to be some <br />education done. On the face of it, it may look like <br />the reason for doing this is to find a way to <br />subsidize development in Portage Prairie. But <br />what isn't realized is that by having Portage Prairie <br />in the AEDA, we're going to get to capture the tax <br />increment from anything developed in Portage <br />Prairie and end up with a much bigger TIF pot. <br />Mr. Inks agreed. He noted that the existing AEDA <br />has experienced about $SOOM in growth since it <br />was declared. Portage Prairie is almost an identical <br />$SOOM project on 450,000 acres. It has tremendous <br />growth and revenue potential for the AEDA. <br />Ms. Jones noted that that is all the more important <br />since we realize that it will be difficult to get a lot <br />of commercial and retail in the LaSalle Square <br />area, but there are other things we can do. <br />However, those things are not taxable. Those <br />projects will not be adding to TIF. We will need <br />taxable development to fund those infrastructure <br />improvements. <br />Mr. Inks noted that Resolution No. 2456 will be on <br />the city's Web site by the end of today. <br />Mr. Inks also reported that staff will begin putting <br />the entire Commission packet of agenda items on <br />the Web site, beginning with the June 25 meeting. <br />Mr. Blake stated that he thinks Mr. Wolfson's <br />concern is urban sprawl, and that is a valid <br />concern. Mr. Wolfson is not in need of educating <br />in that regard. If he has concerns, they are worth <br />paying attention to. Mr. Blake noted that Mr. <br />Wolfson may call some meetings for public <br />discussion of this issue before the June 25 meeting. <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.