My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-05 Utilities Committee
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2005
>
10-24-05 Utilities Committee
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2012 3:37:31 PM
Creation date
12/19/2012 3:37:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
10/24/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1` t <br /> The Solid Waste rate increase is proposed at $8.80 per month per container (an increase of$.80 <br /> per month)with the $5.50 rate for seniors being maintained. <br /> Mr. Gilot noted that they will share this information and do the service club circuit, newspaper <br /> articles and make information available in the lobby of the County-City Building. <br /> In response to a question from Council Member Pi zzello,Mr. Dillon stated that the standard for <br /> treated water which is used is that there should be less than 235 colonies for a sample size. Mr. <br /> Gilot noted that if all of the proposals take place that the non-compliance would go from 30% of <br /> the time to 9% of the time, however the EPA will probably push the city to have more strict <br /> compliance than that proposed by the Administration. <br /> Dr. Varner noted that the proposals are a result of ongoing discussions with the EPA and IDEM. <br /> He voiced concern about new trends in the industry, noting that the rate increase is based on the <br /> rate payers for the next 5-6 years. He questioned what the impact would be on the City <br /> Administration's proposal if there were conservation measures put into place which reduced the <br /> flow for treatment and/or the loss of industrial customers. Dr. Varner noted the nitrates from <br /> agricultural areas should be addressed and perhaps the state legislature needs to consider a water <br /> front tax. <br /> Council Member Dieter inquired about the sewer odors and whether this ongoing problem would <br /> be addressed. <br /> Mr. Dillon stated that they will try a new chemical on November 8, 2005 and that New Energy <br /> is partnering with the city. <br /> Mr. Gilot stated that two (2)trucks are dedicated to work near the ethanol plant in order to treat <br /> the symptoms in the line. <br /> Council Member Dieter questioned whether legal action is being considered, and if so what the <br /> time table would be. <br /> Mr. Gilot stated that they are at the information gathering stage. Mr. Dillon stated that the pilot <br /> program beginning in early November will be monitored and if it does not work they will sit <br /> down with the Legal Department. <br /> Council Member Kirsits noted that the odor problem is along Riverside, Olive, Leland to Park, <br /> Northshore and several other parts of the city. He inquired if the goal of the city is to treat all <br /> storm water? <br /> Mr. Gilot stated that the city is using a "balanced approach" and use the <br /> "best management practices". He noted that the proposed rates are across the board. <br /> Council Member Rouse stated that since 2001 there have been more remonstrators in light of the <br /> increased property taxes, and suggested that this must be taken into consideration when looking <br /> at new utility rates. He noted"that the ballgame has changed since 2001". <br /> October 24,2005 Utilities Committee of the 2005 South Bend Common Council -page 2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.