My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-14-08 Health & Public Safety - Quality of Life Issues
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2008
>
05-14-08 Health & Public Safety - Quality of Life Issues
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2008 9:43:20 AM
Creation date
6/12/2008 9:43:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
5/14/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HEALTH AND PUBLIC SAFETY QUALITY OF LIFE ISSUES Page 1 of 3 <br />The May 14, 2008 meeting of the Health and Public Safety Committee of the South Bend <br />Common Council was called to order by its Chairperson, Councilmember Karen White at 4:31 <br />p.m. in the Council's Informal Meeting Room. <br />Committee Members present: Karen L. White, Chairperson, Ann Puzzello, Vice, Chairperson, <br />Donald Brubaker, Pam Brunette <br />Persons in attendance included: Ann Carol Nash, Catherine Toppel, Jamie Loo, Roger, <br />Hamburg, Winona Hays, Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand, Council Attorney, John Voorde, City Clerk. <br />Councilmember Puzzello, in Councilmember White's absence, asked Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand <br />to outline the purpose of the meeting, <br />Kathy Cekanski-Farrand explained the focus was to be on the implementation and enforcement <br />of current health and public safety ordinances. As well, the Council was looking to identify <br />measurable outcomes for these regulations. <br />By 3:45 Karen White arrived, assuming chair of the meeting. Karen added that the Council <br />hoped to assist the administration in implementation of the regulations. To that end, with <br />transparency a necessity, Karen wanted to clearly identify who was responsible for the <br />enforcement of ordinances and whether additional training was needed. Basically, the focus was <br />to be on who was enforcing the quality of life ordinances, how they were going about it and was <br />the system working. <br />Karen then went on to announce 2 sets of H8~PS meetings. The first series to be held on the 3`~ <br />Wednesday of the each month from 3:30 to 5:00 in the caucus room. Each meeting would focus <br />on one quality of life ordinance. The first meeting would be Wednesday, June 18, to address the <br />scrap, precious metals regulations. See attachment for dates and focus. Also announced was a <br />series of meetings intended to hear neighborhood concerns. One meeting in each councilmanic <br />district, the first in the 4 district on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. in the Zion United <br />Church of Christ. The other 5 meetings to be determined. Karen then recognized Catherine <br />Toppel, Director of Neighborhood Code Enforcement to speak to the committee. <br />Catherine Toppel said she would like to have a meeting with the Council before the neighborhood <br />hearings begin. She maintained that the Department of Code Enforcement was only responsible <br />for 3 of the 17 ordinances listed by the Council as quality of life ordinances. Furthermore she felt <br />the data presented to the Mayor and the questions asked in the November 28, letter from the <br />committee to the Mayor indicated a lack of understanding on the part of the Council as to the <br />enforcement process and her department's efforts. <br />Karen countered that the very purpose of the field hearings was to hear and measure <br />neighborhood concerns, not to hold Neighborhood Code Enforcement up as a target. The <br />purpose was to "connect the dots,° that is identify responsibilities. Such as, who enforces, how, <br />when, and why of the process. The process needs transparency. Only that way can the <br />effectiveness of ordinances be measured. Information should increase understanding, allowing <br />realistic expectations, and collaboration with the administration. Ultimately, the people would be <br />better served. <br />Catherine Toppel cautioned against using numbers (i.e. # of tickets) to gauge effective <br />enforcement. She said her philosophy was to try to resolve issues face to face hopefully <br />achieving resolution without paperwork. Her goal is compliance not paperwork. Nonetheless, <br />she maintained compliance was tracked, albeit mostly in paper files. 111ustrating other challenges <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.