My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
September 1988
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1988
>
September 1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2023 3:21:04 PM
Creation date
3/26/2021 4:06:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
HPC Document Description
HPC Meeting Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001757
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
APPENDIX C <br />ha 0 <br />astoriC reservation comossoon <br />of south bend and st. joseph county <br />ROOM 1123 COUNTY CITY BUILDING <br />south bend, indiana 46601 (219) 284-9798 <br />September 13, 1988 <br />STAFF REPORT <br />Emmaus Lutheran Church <br />92? E. Milton <br />South Bend, IN 46601 <br />Local Landmark <br />PROPOSAL <br />The proposal is to change an existing vii ndoLo on the west <br />facade of an entry appendage in the 1959 addition from a. <br />recessed steel casement to glass block so that the t%iindow <br />surface is flush with the trial l . A flush treatment is <br />requested in order to prevent children from climbing onto <br />the roof by using the ledge for a foothold. <br />STANDARDS <br />B. Treatment <br />A treatment change . . . to the landmark . . . may [not] <br />. . . significantly alter the appearance of the landmark <br />. . . land] . . . the Commission should rev i e44i the proposed <br />treatment for character and style consistency . . . . [The <br />treatment] should be added in a manner that does not disrupt <br />the visual unity of the site. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The t,.6 ndot&1 in question is located on a. non -major facade of <br />the 195? addition to the church. Changes to this feature <br />viould not si9ni.ficant1 affect the historic character of the <br />building. Hoviever, glass black is not an appropriate <br />miter i a.l . <br />Staff recommends that approval is granted to al 1 ovi the <br />change but strongly suggests that an alternative be <br />investigated such as the use of a metal storm vi i ndow <br />installed flush to the wall 4-,ii th the use a durable <br />reinforced glass. such as safety/wire mesh glass, p1exiglass, <br />or 1 exan glass. <br />blp <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.