My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
August 1988
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1988
>
August 1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2023 3:18:18 PM
Creation date
3/26/2021 4:06:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
HPC Document Description
HPC Meeting Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001757
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the Central High School complex as is possible vlh i 1 e <br />al 1 ovii ng for use of the structures as the School Corporation <br />administrative offices. In allowing this use, the concept <br />of access from the viest facade has been approved recognizing <br />the 'School Corporation's need to have convenient access to <br />the building. <br />Central High School's symmetrical design plan is an <br />important consideration in revie4-.ling the plan for the entry <br />on the west facade. The first design choice is to continue <br />this symmetrical treatment on the net,i west entry, opposite <br />the original entry on the east side of the building. <br />However, the Vo-Tec and Powerplant buildings obscure the <br />visual path and may even physically impinge on the site of <br />the proposed ,west entry. The question of the importance of <br />this entry needs to be addressed to make a final <br />determination of its design. An employee or staff entry has <br />different requirements from both a design and accessibility <br />point of viet.t than a public entry. A public entry requires <br />visual prominence and physical accessibility. <br />Staff recommends the consideration of the following three <br />options: <br />OPTION I <br />Maintaining the Vo-Tec and Powerplant buildings with the <br />recommendation that parking be developed on the first floor <br />and mothballing of the second floor. This option provides <br />for preservation of the historic value and integrity of the <br />site, and provides for some needed parking on the site. <br />Disadvantages include a conflict with the design of the 4wes•t <br />facade entry, and limits landscaping on the taestern portion <br />of the site. <br />OPTION II <br />Al 1 owi ng demolition of the Vo-Tec and Pot.,.terpl ant buildings <br />with preservation of the smokestack with the fol 1 ovi i ng <br />mitigation measures: <br />a) Production of HAES drawings and photodocumentat i on <br />of the buildings; <br />b) Placement of an outside commemorative marker noting <br />the significance of the site; <br />c) Installation of permanent indoor interpretive <br />panels in a public area. relating the history of <br />educational buildings on the site; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.