My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
August 1988
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1988
>
August 1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2023 3:18:18 PM
Creation date
3/26/2021 4:06:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
HPC Document Description
HPC Meeting Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001757
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2) 302 Sunn7• s i de - ERAS <br />Owner proposes to replace original slate roofing ►,.ti th GAF <br />S1 ate 1 i ne asphal t roof shingles and w i th appropriate repairs <br />to the decking. Oviner• also proposes to replace gutters with <br />half -round galvanized steel and dovjnspou is with materials <br />similar to existing. Mr. Her•endeen moved to approve variance <br />for removal of original slate and replacement with proposed <br />material , as v.1el 1 as staff rev i evi on site wi th the contrac,tor- <br />a.s. to the appropriateness of retaining the slate on the <br />_. i dev,al 1 s of the dormers; Mr. N i mtz seconded; Mrs. Cho i tz <br />against; motion approved. <br />3) 115 N. St. James Ct . - Central High School - LL <br />The proposal for Part 2 - Certificate of Appropriateness was <br />tabled for further information at the July 18, 15186 meeting. <br />The proposal includes the removal of the Vo-Tec building and <br />povter•pl ant and construction of a ne►,i parking lot awi th <br />additional landscaping on west side of building in context <br />with original plan (see staff report - Appendix B) . <br />Staff recommended consideration of the fol 1 ot,,ti ng three <br />options: <br />Option I <br />Maintaining the Vo-Tec and povterplant buildings vii th the <br />recommendation that parking be developed on the first floor <br />and mothbal 1 i nc► of the second floor. <br />Option II <br />Al1ou;ting demolition of the Vo-Tec and powerplant buildings <br />with preservation of the smokestack twi th mitigation measures <br />(see staff report - Appendix: B) . <br />Option III <br />Retaining the povierpl ant on site along with the smokestack, <br />and allowing the demolition of the l.o-Tec building, with <br />mitigation measures for Vo-Tec building. <br />Mr. Ox i an questioned Pis. Pitts-Ma.n i er, A_.sn` t . City Attorney, <br />whether the specific provisions of the historic landmark <br />standards take precedence over the provisions in the <br />ordinance regarding demolition of landmarks. Ms. <br />Pitts-Manier stated that in deciding a Certificate of <br />Appropriateness the hpc must consider the three provisions <br />indicated in the ordinance (e.g. 1. appropriateness of <br />proposed demolition of the historic landmark; 2. potential <br />hardship costs; and 3. detriment to the public vlelfare and <br />safety.) in addition to the provisions of the standards. <br />August 15, 1988 PAGE 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.