My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
50106 Bittersweet Trail_AA 2021-0301A
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
2021
>
April
>
Administrative Approval
>
50106 Bittersweet Trail_AA 2021-0301A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2021 3:40:34 PM
Creation date
3/3/2021 4:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Street Address
50106 Bittersweet Trail
HPC Document Type
Certification
HPC Local Landmark
ii. Unincorporated St. Joseph County
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Adam Toering <br />From:dviss830@comcast.net <br />Sent:Friday, March 12, 2021 7:47 AM <br />To:Elicia Feasel; Adam Toering <br />Cc:Ross Van Overberghe <br />Subject:Visser -- 50106 Bittersweet Tr. <br />Follow Up Flag:Follow up <br />Flag Status:Flagged <br />Thank you for helping me with my recent CoA for the front portico. I have an update. <br /> <br />My contractor had 2nd thoughts about installing the new portico ON the non‐original concrete steps that are there. He <br />believes that settling (although not evident at this time) could risk the build of the portico that we install over the entry <br />way. Plans that were approved call for standing the posts ON the steps (as shown in the 1980's images). He is <br />suggesting that we remove the concrete steps (they are not attached to the house) and build the wooden decking that is <br />like the original instead (as in the 1890's and 1905 images). It will be placed on/in freeze‐line footers, so it won't <br />move. It would match the original images/structure better anyhow. Cosmesis will still be achieved as previously <br />described/approved. Only the base changes. <br /> <br />If this calls for reapplying, I understand. If it also calls for board, I further understand. I feel awkward since this could <br />have been decided beforehand, yet I see the validity in all of the ways proposed. <br /> <br />David Visser <br /> <br /> <br /> David A. Visser, DVM <br /> Veterinarian / Co-Director <br /> 69905 M-62 <br />Edwardsburg, Michigan 49112 <br /> (888) PETS-VETS <br /> (269) 663-3235 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.