My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
50106 Bittersweet Trail_AA 2021-0301A
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
2021
>
April
>
Administrative Approval
>
50106 Bittersweet Trail_AA 2021-0301A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2021 3:40:34 PM
Creation date
3/3/2021 4:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Street Address
50106 Bittersweet Trail
HPC Document Type
Certification
HPC Local Landmark
ii. Unincorporated St. Joseph County
该页面上没有批注。
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Adam Toering <br />From:dviss830@comcast.net <br />Sent:Friday, March 12, 2021 7:47 AM <br />To:Elicia Feasel; Adam Toering <br />Cc:Ross Van Overberghe <br />Subject:Visser -- 50106 Bittersweet Tr. <br />Follow Up Flag:Follow up <br />Flag Status:Flagged <br />Thank you for helping me with my recent CoA for the front portico. I have an update. <br /> <br />My contractor had 2nd thoughts about installing the new portico ON the non‐original concrete steps that are there. He <br />believes that settling (although not evident at this time) could risk the build of the portico that we install over the entry <br />way. Plans that were approved call for standing the posts ON the steps (as shown in the 1980's images). He is <br />suggesting that we remove the concrete steps (they are not attached to the house) and build the wooden decking that is <br />like the original instead (as in the 1890's and 1905 images). It will be placed on/in freeze‐line footers, so it won't <br />move. It would match the original images/structure better anyhow. Cosmesis will still be achieved as previously <br />described/approved. Only the base changes. <br /> <br />If this calls for reapplying, I understand. If it also calls for board, I further understand. I feel awkward since this could <br />have been decided beforehand, yet I see the validity in all of the ways proposed. <br /> <br />David Visser <br /> <br /> <br /> David A. Visser, DVM <br /> Veterinarian / Co-Director <br /> 69905 M-62 <br />Edwardsburg, Michigan 49112 <br /> (888) PETS-VETS <br /> (269) 663-3235 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.