My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Amending 14 Adding New Article 3 Prohibition of Open Alcoholic Beverage Containers
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Ordinances
>
1991
>
Amending 14 Adding New Article 3 Prohibition of Open Alcoholic Beverage Containers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2012 1:19:24 PM
Creation date
10/22/2012 1:19:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Ordinances
City Counci - Date
8/26/1991
Ord-Res Number
8206-91
Bill Number
51-91
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> • <br /> It should be stressed that the proposed ordinance would <br /> provide another civil tool to assist our Police <br /> Officers in carrying our their routine duties related <br /> to the public safety of both citizens and property <br /> while in the City limits. This proposed bill does not <br /> and cannot impose any criminal sanctions, since that <br /> would be inconsistent with Indiana State Law. <br /> This ordinance should not be confused with the <br /> sanctions imposed by State Law primarily within Title 9 <br /> of the Indiana Code addressing "Traffic Offenses and <br /> Procedures" . <br /> It is my understanding the Council Member Luecke has <br /> raised a question with regard to the possible search of <br /> a vehicle. Both the United States Supreme Court and <br /> the Indiana Supreme Court have numerous cases <br /> addressing searches of automobiles. Although it is <br /> difficult, if not impossible, to summarize the several <br /> hundred cases addressing this issue, there are some <br /> basic principles and important constitutional <br /> principles which evolve from these cases. First, if a <br /> police officer has lawfully impounded a vehicle, the <br /> officer may conduct an inventory search to protect the <br /> owner of the car and its contents and to protect the <br /> police from claims of lost or stolen property. <br /> Secondly, if a police officer has lawfully impounded a <br /> car and has probable cause to believe that the car <br /> contains evidence of a crime, a warrantless search may <br /> be made even though it is convenient to obtain a <br /> warrant. Thirdly, there may be circumstances <br /> justifying a search of a car short of probable cause, <br /> to believe that the car contained evidence of a crime. <br /> Lastly, in a situation in which a police officer is <br /> legitimately inside or looking into a car, the police <br /> officer may sieze and evidence that is in "plain view". <br /> Therefore, it is anticipated that if this bill is <br /> passed, that it would be enforced in conjunction with <br /> the enforcement of Title 9 State Law regulations. <br /> It should also be noted that under the "home rule" <br /> legislation provided to the City through State Law <br /> (I.C. 36-1-3-1 through 36-1-3-9) , it is the policy of <br /> the State to grant to Cities "all the powers that they <br /> need for the effective operation of government as to <br /> local affairs". The home rule statute further provides <br /> that "any doubt as to the existence of a power of a <br /> unit shall be resolved in favor of its existence". <br /> Cases interpreting some of the provisions of home rule <br /> have noted that City ordinances ar presumed to be valid <br /> and constitutional until adjudged to the contrary by a <br /> court of competent jurisdiction. The courts have also <br /> noted that when a municipal corporation exercises its <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.