My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revised City of South Bend Disparity Study Report
sbend
>
Public
>
Inclusive Procurement and Contracting Board (MBE/WBE)
>
Reports
>
Revised City of South Bend Disparity Study Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2020 1:57:54 PM
Creation date
11/3/2020 1:55:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CCS of South Bend Disparity Study 2020 <br />cific discriminatory policies and that those policies were more than a reflection of <br />societal discrimination "30 <br />South Bend need not prove that it is itself guilty of discrimination to meet its bur- <br />den. In upholding Denver's M/WBE construction program, the court stated that <br />Denver can show its compelling interest by "evidence of private discrimination in <br />the local construction industry coupled with evidence that it has become a passive <br />participant in that discrimination ... [by] linking its spending practices to the private <br />discrimination."31 Denver further linked its award of public dollars to discrimina- <br />tory conduct through the testimony of M/WBEs that identified general contractors <br />who used them on City projects with M/WBE goals but refused to use them on pri- <br />vate projects without goals. <br />The following are the evidentiary elements courts have looked to in examining the <br />basis for and determining the constitutional validity of race- and gender -conscious <br />local programs and the steps in performing a disparity study necessary to meet <br />those elements. <br />1. Define South Bend's Market Areas <br />The first step is to determine the market areas in which the City operates. Cro- <br />son states that a state or local government may only remedy discrimination <br />within its own contracting market area. The City of Richmond was specifically <br />faulted for including minority contractors from across the country in its pro- <br />gram, based on national data considered by Congress. 32 The City must there- <br />fore empirically establish the geographic and product dimensions of its <br />contracting and procurement market area to ensure that the program meets <br />strict scrutiny. This is a fact driven inquiry; it may or may not be the case that <br />the market area is the government's jurisdictional boundaries. 33 <br />A commonly accepted definition of geographic market area for disparity stud- <br />ies is the locations that account for at least 75 percent of the agency's contract <br />and subcontract dollar payments. 34 Likewise, the accepted approach is to ana- <br />lyze those detailed industries that make up at least 75 percent of the prime <br />contract and associated subcontract payments for the study period .35 This <br />produces the utilization results within the geographic market area. <br />30. Concrete Works IV, 321 F.3d at 976. <br />31. Id. at 977. <br />32. Croson, 488 U.S. at 508. <br />33. Concrete Works 11, 36 F.3d at 1520 (to confine data to strict geographic boundaries would ignore "economic reality'). <br />34. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2010, Guidelines for Conducting a Disparity and Availability <br />Studyfor the Federal DBE Program, p. 49. Washington, Dc: The National Academies Press. ttps://dol.org/10.17226/ <br />14346. ("National Disparity Study Guidelines"). <br />35. Id, at pp. 50-51. <br />0 2020 Colette Holt & Associates, All Rights Reserved. 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.