9458-03 Vacation - Alley - Frances, Quimby, Angela,

Home Browse Search

Angela K. Jacob Page 2 October 7, 2002 Angela K. Jacob October 7, 2002 Page Two 4. Claude Joyner - Ft. Wayne This alley has not been developed and is not being used. No objection to vacation. There is a curb cut for the alley approach that should be closed. I presume that Rev. Joyner is a an adjoining property owner and has standing to make this petition. It appears that the neighboring property, used as a parking lot for a club, uses the alley approach for access to the parking lot " 5. Willie J. Rogers -1033 W. Bryan Street This alley has not been developed and is not being used. No objection to vacation. There is a curb cut for the alley approach that should be closed. 6. Julia Greene - 2909 Sugar Maple North Ms. Greene proposes to vacate a small portion of Sugar Maple Drive in orderto limit access into the Maple Lane Fours Apartments site. My first concern is Ms. Greene's standing to make this petition. Is she owner of property adjacent to the segment being proposed for vacation? !f not, can she persuade that owner to make the petition? This vacation would severely limit vehicular access to the street network for several hundred residents. It would be the petitioner's responsibility to provide alternate access in order to receive my recommendation to vacate this street segment. Also, it would be necessary to close the curb cut for Sugar Maple Lane and to create a cul-de-sac or other means in the public right of way for vehicles to turn and reverse direction at the east end of the vacated se ossible-bu~nnlikel~_ 7. Martha Lewis - 308 S. Frances St. I have no objection to this alley vacation. There is a garage on Lot 13 on Quimby Street that uses the alley for access. The owners may need to make cross-access agreements. The curb cut on Quimby Street will need to be closed or transformed into a driveway. What w•e do today makes a difference!