Laserfiche WebLink
GUARANTEE MANAGEMENT <br />CITY OF SOUTH BEND: PINHOOK WTP IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT GUARANTEED SAVINGS CONTRACT <br />GUARANTEE MANAGEMENT <br />GUARANTEE APPROACH & HOW IT MEETS IC 36-1-12-5 <br />A. Explain how the Provider plans to address the guarantee for this type of project and how it <br />meets Indiana requirements of IC 36-1-12.5. <br />In Indiana, capital costs avoided may be identified as a financial benefit that helps to form the statutory justification for <br />implementing a guaranteed savings contract (“GSC”). Capital costs are referred to statutorily as “related capital <br />expenditures.” These costs, by definition, must satisfy three essential requirements in order to be used as cost <br />reductions that offset the price of a GSC. <br />Those requirements include: 1. the customer’s reasonable belief such capital costs will be incurred during the <br />guarantee term, 2. appropriate documentation of capital costs using specified standards, and 3. a causal link between <br />the capital costs avoided and the conservation measures (“ECMs”) being implemented. <br />All the savings categories can be verified by stipulating the savings using documented engineering standards to model <br />the operating characteristics. These engineering standards include. <br />a. Lifecycle costing <br />b. R.S. Means estimating <br />c. Historical data <br />d. Manufacturers data <br />As defined in the statute, stipulated savings are savings which the City/utility believes are reasonable and are <br />documented by industry engineering standards using a single method or combination of methods. For capital intensive <br />projects like this project, stipulating savings are fully compliant and meet the requirements of I.C. 36-1-12.5. <br />Savings are calculated using assumptions, variables, and equations which will be shown on actual models and <br />spreadsheets. These spreadsheets will provide total annual savings, including energy, operational and capital costs <br />avoided. These savings will be stipulated between the parties throughout the term of the performance guarantee. <br />METHODOLOGY FOR BASELINE <br />B. Describe the methodology used to compute the energy baseline. <br />Baselines can be developed in several ways to include analyzing the actual utility bills or modeling the electrical <br />consuming devices or by using historical data from the manufacturer’s nameplate data. The Reynolds team will collect <br />data (primarily horsepower and motor efficiency) from manufacturers nameplates of equipment required to process the <br />related flows. This data will be inputted into a spreadsheet that will calculate baseline energy consumption and cost <br />ENERGY BASELINE CALCULATION <br />EXISTING SYSTEM <br />Electric Power Usage Utility Fee = $ 0.05 /kW-hr <br />Item# UnitsBHP/UnitMotor Eff.Hrs/DayDays/WkWk/Year$/Yr <br />WWTP TREATMENT @ 2.0 MGD <br />Primary Pumps445.091%24.0752$64,428 <br />Primary Screen212.091%24.0752$8,590 <br />Aeration Rotors440.091%24.0752$57,270 <br />WAS Pump18.088%24.0752$2,978 <br />Anaerobic Mixer210.088%24.0752$7,445 <br />Clarification11.5083%24.0752$592 <br />Addl. Return Sludge Pumping115.090%24.0752$5,459 <br />Disinfection18.090%24.0752$2,911 <br />Sludge Drying120.090%24.0752$7,279 <br />$156,953 <br />Annual Cost <br />Collection Pumping @ 2.0 MGD <br />Pumps259.394.1%10.0752$17,105 <br />$174,059 <br />TOTAL ANNUAL <br />Page | 50 <br /> <br />