My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
36-20 Modlin Repeal Ordinance
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2020
>
10-05-2020- Special Meeting of the Common Council
>
36-20 Modlin Repeal Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2020 11:41:59 AM
Creation date
10/1/2020 3:40:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Ordinances
City Counci - Date
8/24/2020
Bill Number
36-20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Andrews asked if there was anything that needed to be added to <br />the motion to add clarity for future additional properties. <br />Specialist Toering showed the Commission a property on Gumwood Road that <br />was delisted by the Commission in 1983 because of the addition of an <br />unsympathetic porch addition, and that this was a response by the Commission <br />to dealing with an uncooperative property owner who did not adhere to the <br />Certificate of Appropriateness process and the Commission as a whole. <br />Commissioner Downs-Krostenko stated that the Commission should not oppose <br />the delisting of the property, but should not actively pursue delisting. <br />Commissioner Hertel stated that she supported delisting the property. <br />Legal Counsel Kennedy clarified that stating that the Commission does not <br />oppose the delisting would help the Common Council understand how to move <br />forward. <br />Commissioner Brazinsky asked for clarification for delisting and completing the <br />work. Legal Counsel Kennedy stated that a Building Permit would still be <br />required for executing the work. Delisting the property would still need to be <br />done by ordinance. <br />Commissioner Andrews asked about the title search of historic properties. <br />Specialist Toering stated that some of the districts are recorded; all of the <br />County properties have been recorded. <br />Commissioner Gelfman asked Commissioner Wyncott was familiar with the <br />property. Specialist Toering explained that he gave Commissioner Wyncott a <br />brief update prior to the meeting. <br />Commissioner Andrews made a motion that the Historic Preservation Commission is <br />in support of the Council de -designating 60649 Hickory Road as a Local <br />Landmark. Seconded by Commission Brazinsky. <br />Commissioner Hertel asked for clarification that the property could be <br />landmarked again in the future, were there a different property owner. <br />Legal Counsel Kennedy explained that would be an entirely new landmark <br />designation. <br />Commissioner Gelf nan asked Commission Andrews to repeat her previous <br />motion. <br />Commissioner Andrews made a motion that the Historic Preservation Commission is <br />in support of the Council de -designating 60649 Hickory Road as a Local <br />Landmark. Seconded by Commission Brazinsky. <br />Eight in favor, none opposed. <br />Vote: 8 — 0. The motion to voice support for de -designating 60649 Hickory Road <br />passes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.