Laserfiche WebLink
III. STANDARD OF REVIEW. <br />The denial by HPC of the Museum's Petition at the June 15, 2020 HPC meeting and <br />underlying conclusions and factual determinations are: <br />(1) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with <br />law; <br />(2) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; <br />(3) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory <br />right; <br />(4) without observance of procedure required by law; and/or <br />(5) unsupported by substantial evidence. <br />In support, the Museum states: <br />IV. FACTS, ARGUMENTS AND CONTENTIONS <br />A. Preservation. <br />As a basis for denial of the Petition, HPC indicated that it would like to see more in terms <br />of proposed future funding for maintenance as a way for making up for the potential loss in historic <br />tax credit resources. After it is moved, the Cabin will lose its status on the National Register of <br />Historic Places, as well as HPC oversight as a Local Historic Landmark. However, the Museum <br />intends to (1) apply for Local Historic Landmark status to continue the protective oversight of the <br />HPC and work closely with HPC on issues regarding maintenance and upkeep, and (2) reapply for <br />National Register status for the Cabin on its own merits, instead of as a part of Leeper Park. <br />Even so, the Museum has only asked for federal grant money once, when a DNR grant <br />provided a portion of the restoration costs for the Cabin. This restoration was an exceptional case, <br />which the Museum does not expect to have to undertake again, and the funds received provided <br />10 <br />