My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COA APPLICATION #2020-0302: NORTHERN INDIANA HISTORIC SOCIETY INC. V. SOUTH BEND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2020
>
09-14-2020
>
COA APPLICATION #2020-0302: NORTHERN INDIANA HISTORIC SOCIETY INC. V. SOUTH BEND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2020 10:35:37 AM
Creation date
9/9/2020 12:46:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Letter
City Counci - Date
9/14/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9.0 LANDSCAPES — STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR LEEPER PARK <br />9.1 Introduction <br />1. In these guidelines the verb Should indicates a recommended course of action; the verb <br />Shall indicates those actions which are specifically required to preserve and protect <br />significant architectural elements. <br />2. The intent of these standards and criteria is to preserve the overall character and <br />appearance of Leeper Park including its spatial organization, topography, vegetation, <br />circulation and features. <br />3. The standards and criteria acknowledge that there will be changes to the landscape and <br />are intended to make the change sensitive to the historic character of the landscape. <br />4. Each property will be separately studied to determine if a later addition(s) and/or <br />alteration(s) can, or should, be removed. <br />5. Since it is not possible to provide one general guideline, the following factors that will be <br />considered in determining whether a later addition(s) and/or alteration(s) can, or should, <br />be removed include: <br />a. Compatibility with the original property's integrity in scale, materials, and <br />character. <br />b. Historic association with the property. <br />c. Quality in design and execution of the addition/alteration. <br />d. Functional usefulness. <br />6. Recreational facilities which exist should be allowed to remain as long as they serve <br />substantial community functions. In some cases these features can be redesigned to be <br />more compatible with the overall landscape. <br />7. Additions to existing recreational facilities shall not be allowed unless such additions <br />make the facilities more compatible with the overall landscape. <br />8. The development of additional facilities for active recreation or single purpose uses for <br />limited user groups shall not be allowed. <br />9. Proposals for special activities and events which cause significant impacts or require <br />permanent or even semi-permanent (seasonal) structures or facilities shall not be <br />permitted. <br />10. The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County <br />recommends that the work proposed to the landscape be executed with the guidance of <br />landscape professional with expertise with historic landscapes. <br />11. The land, streets, island(s), street lighting, park lighting, topography, vistas, vegetation, <br />architectural elements, structures, spatial organization, street furniture, sewer covers, <br />electrical and water vault and/or manholes covers, parking areas are subject to the terms <br />of the landscape guidelines herein stated. <br />12. Items under Historic Preservation review include but are not limited to the following: <br />9.2 Spatial Organization (includes, Views, Vistas, Landscape Spaces, etc.) <br />Refer to Sections 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7 and 9.8 for additional Standards and Criteria that <br />may apply. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.