Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Signed Minutes - January 21, 2020

Home Browse Search

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Prepared by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator PETITIONER COMMENTS: Commissioner Annis: I think last month we had questions as to the differences in the heights of the fences from the back portion that you are seeking approval for today versus what is already in existence. Mr. Wittling: So the first fence, on the north side, that is more of a dining patio. The one on the direct west side encompasses a gaming area. So there is family, kids, dogs — we have various games with balls flying around. So, we felt that the only way to really protect that and not have any disruption into the street was to have a taller fence to allow those activities. COMMISSION DISCUSSION: Commissioner Brazinksy: For the record, I just want to let everyone know that I work with Frank Perri with Business Development. Commissioner Gelfman: Thank you, we appreciate that. Commissioner Hertel: I don't think it's a bad project, I just wish it wasn't a retroactive project. I'm not a huge fan of the pergola, only because I am not so sure that it is historically accurate piece of decoration at that time. I can understand the different height of the fence, that absolutely makes sense. I also wish it wasn't inconsistent. I don't care for the inconsistency. Commissioner Gelfinan: The heights of the fence? Commissioner Hertel: Yeah. It gives it a different look. Commissioner Gelfman: We can break this into two parts, one for the fence, and one for the pergola, if you would like. Does that matter to anyone? Or shall we put them together? Commissioner Stalheim: I'm content. Commissioner Hertel: Keep it together. Commissioner Annis: I think it will be interesting to see what happens to this as the wood on the pergola ages, so if it was stained or if it was cedar wood, it would age differently than if it was the untreated wood as it is now. Mr. Wittling: So we are letting season for a full year, and then we are planning on painting it grey to match the exterior primary color, within the historic building. And further blending into the original structure. Commissioner Gelfinan: We would hope that — and I think I can speak for the Commission that — if you had had decided to, down the road, change the pergola that you would seek the assistance of the HPC office and the Commission. We would appreciate that. Mr. Wittling: If I can extend my sincere apologies on behalf of myself and Frank Perri for not seeking your approval properly. Commissioner Gelfman: Thank you. PUBLIC DISCUSSION: N/A Commissioner Annis made a motion to approve COA #2019-1203 as applied. Seconded by Commissioner Stalheim. Eight in favor, none opposed. Vote: 7 —1. Motion to approve COA #2019-1203 is passed. Mr. Wittling: Thank you all very much, I appreciate your time and understanding as well. The community has embraced the project, we love the building, we look forward to many years within the community and the growing footprint that J. C. Lauber provided back in 1890. Commissioner Gelfman: Thank you. And thank you for concern about future (Certificates of Appropriateness). We appreciate that. IV. PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR N/A