My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-08 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
03-28-08 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2008 12:46:09 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 12:42:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting -March 28, 2008 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />A. Public Hearing <br />(2) continued... <br />said he would be happy to talk to Mr. <br />Aichele about acquisition. <br />To address Mr. Jaworski's question, Mr. <br />Schalliol said the plan anticipates residential, <br />commercial, and recreational plans for the <br />ballpark improvements. We want to have as <br />many uses in the area as we can. While we <br />don't have an overly specific plan at this <br />time, site control is the key. Until we have <br />site control, it's tough to be overly specific <br />on what your plans can be. We're working <br />to get some site control. That will help us <br />formulate plans to move forward. <br />Mr. Peczkowsk: I have been opposed to this <br />project from the beginning on several <br />grounds. Among them, who does this <br />benefit? I have had reservations as to who is <br />the main beneficiary of all the money that's <br />going to be spent on this project. Our <br />population in the last decade led Indiana in <br />decline. I think that the luxury of a ballpark, <br />while it has been an asset to the city and, as <br />we are trying to assess right now, perhaps an <br />underdeveloped asset, that we haven't <br />completely assessed what that asset is. What <br />is the attendance at single-A ballparks as <br />opposed to double-A and triple-A ballparks <br />which HOK has more experience with. Their <br />previous proposals have dealt with ballparks <br />that have larger audiences and I don't see <br />that ours is going to change. Are we going to <br />go to a double-A? Are we going to go to a <br />triple-A franchise? We've been averaging <br />between two and three thousand people per <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.