My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Document of Interest Provided By Councilmember Hamann on Civilian Review Boards
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Community Police Review Board (CPRB)
>
Document of Interest Provided By Councilmember Hamann on Civilian Review Boards
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2020 10:09:33 AM
Creation date
6/23/2020 10:08:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
181
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C ITIZEN R EVIEW OF P OLICE: APPROACHES AND I MPLEMENTATION <br />85 <br />Police Review Commission was established in <br />1974. Board members in Omaha receive no <br />compensation. <br />Selection of board members <br />Jurisdictions need to recruit and screen board members <br />carefully. <br />Oversight legislation in Orange County, <br />as in many other jurisdictions, requires <br />that “The composition of the CRB <br />[Citizen Review Board] shall endeavor <br />to reflect the ethnic, racial and econom- <br />ic diversity of Orange County.” <br />• The five civilian members of the St. <br />Paul Police Civilian Internal Affairs <br />Review Commission include one <br />woman, one African-American, one Hispanic, and one <br />gay person. They include the director of a community- <br />based organization, the vice president of a lighting fix- <br />ture company, a court psychologist, the director of <br />enforcement for the State Commerce Department, and <br />an IBM project director. <br />• The seven Minneapolis board members consist of three <br />African-Americans, one Native American, and three <br />Caucasians. Three members are women. Members’ <br />occupations are the former assistant State ombudsman <br />for corrections, a minister, a professor who teaches <br />police ethics, a retired social worker and probation <br />officer, a school teacher who is also a nonsworn Parks <br />Department police agent, a former city housing author- <br />ity employee, and a county public defender’s office <br />employee. <br />As Minneapolis’ board composition suggests, many juris- <br />dictions look for volunteers with some type of back- <br />ground in the criminal justice system. Portland’s citizen <br />advisers include a retired State patrol <br />officer, a retired police chief, a judge, <br />and a defense attorney. Allowing current <br />or former law enforcement officers to <br />serve is controversial (see “Should <br />Police Officers and Sheriff’s Deputies <br />Serve on Boards?”). Few jurisdictions <br />choose active police officers to serve; <br />some local ordinances prohibit their <br />selection. The Berkeley ordinance pro- <br />hibits all city employees from serving. <br />Boards typically do not include local activists, such as <br />members of local chapters of the American Civil <br />Liberties Union or the Lawyers Guild. <br />Lisa Botsko’s written description of Portland’s citizen <br />advisers’ responsibilities and duties includes the <br />ability to: <br />• Work with persons of opposing viewpoints. <br />• Provide constructive criticism. <br />• Communicate effectively, verbally and in writing. <br />Allowing current or <br />former law enforcement <br />officers to serve on <br />volunteer oversight boards <br />is controversial. <br />ROCHESTER’S BOARD MEMBERS ALL ARE TRAINED MEDIATORS <br />Rochester trains all Civilian Review Board members in mediation. According to Todd Samolis,the CRB coordinator: <br />Mediation training exercises focus on helping participants to become aware of their biases—since everyone has <br />them and they cannot be eliminated—so that as board members they can keep these prejudices in check when <br />they review IA cases. Mediation training increases their ability to think impartially. <br />According to one board member,“The [mediation training] program was probably the most educationally enlight- <br />ening experience I’ve ever had.” <br />Samolis also believes that “mediation training increases listening skills dramatically. In addition, it helps panelists to <br />absorb the information in the case files in terms of who said what, when, and where—to keep things straight— <br />and to spot inconsistencies.”
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.