My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Signed Minutes - July 15, 2019
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2019
>
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Signed Minutes - July 15, 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2020 5:18:45 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:41:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />APPLICATION ITEMS: “Replacement of the asbestos tile roof and galvanized gutters with the Classic Products Oxford <br />metal shingle and new galvanized gutters” <br />DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Contractor has applied to install new Oxford metal shingle over existing <br />asbestos tile roof, and to install new galvanized half round gutters. <br /> <br />While the 81-year-old roof has been maintained over the years, Slatile Roofing and Sheet Metal Co., Inc. and Pr eservation <br />Inspector have concluded that the asbestos shingle roof is failing and may be considered beyond repair at this point, please see <br />respective letters for details. <br /> <br />Slatile has proposed to install a metal shingle style roof system that would allow for the asbestos to remain installed on the <br />house. Per the contractor, the main reason for not removing the asbestos is to eliminate the hazard of asbestos particles <br />becoming airborne during demolition and the possibility of becoming a health hazard to the neighborhood. Another reason is the <br />cost of the removal and special considerations needed in disposal, both of which result in a higher cost. Staff advocates for <br />removal of asbestos prior to installing a new roof product to eliminate a potentially hazardous material from existing on the <br />house and to remedy any moisture concerns related to the vegetation growing in or behind the asbestos tile. Regarding the <br />proposed metal roof, this particular product is not commonly found in historic districts but would simulate a tile scale, texture, <br />and pattern. <br /> <br />At the June 17, 2019 meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission continued the application requesting from the petitioner <br />that at the next meeting they return with numbers on how much the asbestos removal would cost, and then how much it would <br />cost to remove with the installation of the asphalt architectural shingles, and then how much this project would cost with th e <br />containment metal material, and then also that the homeowner please be present. <br /> <br />Requested items have been provided by the contractor; the following is a summary: <br />1. (Application Item) Installation of the Classic Products Oxford aluminum panels over the existing asbestos t ile roof <br />$79,275.00 <br />2. Complete tear off of the existing asbestos tile roof and installation of the Classic Products Oxford aluminum panels <br />$110,250.00 <br />3. Complete tear off of the existing asbestos tile roof and installation of the Certainteed Landmark architectural shingles <br />$80,220.00 <br /> <br />In reaction to thoughtful discussion from the June meeting, Staff contacted the Indiana Department of Environmental <br />Management, South Bend Building Department, and St. Joseph County Health Department to discover that there is no <br />requirement for removal of residential asbestos roofs and that installing a roof system over top asbestos material is allowed . <br /> <br />The proposed gutters are in – kind. <br /> <br />PRESERVATION INSPECTOR REPORT: <br />On June 6, 2019 I met with Wendell Simmons from Slatile and Preservation Specialist Adam Toering at the property located at <br />1133 E Wayne N part of the East Wayne Local Historic District. <br />The owner has applied (through the contractor) to cover the existing asbestos shingles with a substrate membrane then finish <br />with aluminum asbestos looking aluminum roof tiles. The step flashing at the chimneys will have to replaced with a taller <br />version, and the distinctive half-round gutters will also have to be removed and rehung. <br />There are missing or broken tiles in several locations. The owners and contractors have been using up a stockpile of matching <br />tiles, but now that supply has been depleted. Patches of moss are everywhere on all sides of the roof. This would suggest tha t the <br />existing underlayment under the asbestos tiles has failed so far as to allow moisture to pool. Not to mention the extra weight. <br />The moss will need to be removed and the areas washed to prevent regrowth. <br />In a previous application for 1105 E Wayne where asbestos tiles were present, the roofing had been removed, properly disposed <br />of, and a new underlayment and roof material then installed. I am aware that there are additional costs, but the removal of t he <br />asbestos tiles is the only permanent solution. The new underlayment is to be installed with screws and washers through the <br />existing asbestos tiles and underlayment. I would question leaving failed material in place rather than removing it. <br />Steve Szaday <br />Preservation Inspector <br />STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EAST WAYNE STREET <br />II. EXISTING STRUCTURES <br />B. ROOFS AND ROOFING <br />Roof shapes in the district encompass most of the various designs found in residential structures. Roofs <br />are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood, and slate shingles, as well <br />as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The facias of <br />some vinyl or metal sided houses are covered with the same material. <br /> <br />Required
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.