My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Signed Minutes - July 15, 2019
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2019
>
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Signed Minutes - July 15, 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2020 5:18:45 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:41:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that existing original windows that are not deteriorated beyond repair, be <br />retained and that windows that are deteriorated beyond repair and that existing replacement windows be replaced with units <br />resembling the original. As a contributing property in a historic district, and constructed of masonry, Staff does not recommend <br />the proposed Window World 4000 Series vinyl window. Staff recommends approval to replace doors, and to install vents and <br />electric meters. <br /> <br />Report compiled by <br />Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Administrator <br /> <br />Commissioner Molnar rejoined the proceedings at 6:45 pm. <br /> <br />PETITIONER COMMENTS: <br />Mr. Crumlish introduced the project, stating that they intend to create uniformity in the structure in the exterior appearance, <br />increase the energy efficiency, updating the electrical will require installing multiple exterior meters, and the <br />bathroom vents are a necessity for code. <br />Mr. St. Clair read a prepared letter from the property owners, Adam Sharp and David Steinberg, one lives in Florida and the <br />other in Carmel, IN, Adam has been very active at the property as the owner and has been at the property numerous <br />times. <br />“Good evening, we’d like to thank the Historic Preservation Commission for their attention and assistance regarding <br />the revitalization of the apartment building at 629 Carroll Street. We apologize that neither one of us is able to attend <br />this meeting in person. We are excited about this project and believe that it will act as a cornerstone tha t will <br />stimulate further investment and revitalization in the Taylor’s Field neighborhood. As you know, this building has <br />fallen into a state of severe disrepair and has been neglected for many years prior to our acquisition of the property in <br />November of 2018. We do feel strongly regarding preservation and the history and nature of the character of the <br />exterior of the building and have appreciated the Historic Preservation Commission’s assistance in insuring this is a <br />priority. It is worth noting that at no time during our acquisition of the building did the seller disclose to us that the <br />building was in a Historic District under any type of restrictions. We purchased this building commensurate with our <br />model of revitalizing older apartment buildings to provide safe, clean, and affordable housing to single or double <br />occupancy tenants. We believe that there is a severe shortage of this type of housing in many cities in Indiana. While <br />this is not our primary occupation–we are practicing physicians—we are both passionate about this endeavor and have <br />completed similar projects in Crawfordsville and Muncie, Indiana, over the last couple of years. Although we are <br />very committed to preserving the historical aspects of the building, the windows will all need to be replaced, <br />secondary to poor functioning and poor energy efficiency, it will be needed to install necessary safety features. We <br />currently selected a premium vinyl window that we have used in other projects that has proven to be both great quality <br />and compelling aesthetic appeal in those existing buildings. This window is available in a number of color options, <br />and we are asking for the Historic Preservation Commission to consider the vinyl replacement windows that will <br />enable us to meet all necessary criteria while ensuring that we will stay within our reno budget so as to best complete <br />the revitalization of the building. We look forward to providing safe, clean and affordable housing for the residents of <br />South Bend and hope to complete this project by the end of the first quarter of 2020, where we can once again <br />welcome new occupants to the building. It is our intention to continue to invest in South Bend and we look forward to <br />working with you in the future on additional projects. Your time and attention on this project is greatly appreciated. <br />We once again apologize for not being able to be present for this discussion in person. Respectfully, Adam Sharp and <br />David Steinberg. <br />Mr. Crumlish showed the proposed window. <br />Commissioner Gelfman asked for an assessment by Inspector Szaday of the window. <br />Inspector Szaday said that the sills and jams on the west side and south west side are compromised. Inspector Szaday conveyed <br />that a number of the windows have been replaced. The windows that do not have grids are later replacements. The <br />replacement windows are of varying qualities. Inspector Szaday discussed the location of a fire that affected <br />Mr. St. Clair explained that the entirety of the structure – inside and out – will be rehabilitated. Drywall, flooring, electrical, <br />plumbing. This project is in excess of seven figures, and is a big investment by the property owners. <br />Mr. Crumlish spoke about the extensive interior renovations and the desire of the property owner to instal l an electric heating <br />system to replace the gas boiler system that failed, leading to the eviction of all the previous tenants. The new system <br />will be redundant. <br />Commissioner Gelfman asked if the vinyl windows were the primary choice by Mr. Crumlish. <br />Mr. Crumlish explained that it was not his first selection, but he supports the project. <br />Inspector Szaday explained that the building was ordered ‘vacate and sealed’ by Code Enforcement because of the heating <br />issues. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER DISCUSSION: <br />Commissioner Hertel expressed her disapproval of the proposed windows, voiced approval for the proposed door and venting. <br />She asked for clarification regarding the utility meter placement. <br />Mr. Crumlish explained that were they to restore the original windows, there would still be forty-plus replacement windows. <br />The applicant is attempting to create uniformity across the entirety of the building.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.