Laserfiche WebLink
RE: 50106 Bittersweet Trail -St. Joseph County Local Landmark <br />On September 27, 2018, Adam Toering and I visited the site located at 50106 Bittersweet Trail to meet <br />with the property owner and contractor. They are preparing a COA application and wanted a site visit/consultation <br />to discuss the project. <br />In order to simplify this report, I will give a description of each section moving from south to north. Many <br />alterations have not helped the structural integrity of the original corn crib structure. The original barn has been <br />removed leaving a corner support and footer which is part of the newest structure that was constructed between the <br />original barn and corn crib. <br />Southern half of corn crib structure <br />-Alternating open siding exterior wall originally designed to allow air to pass through crop allowing crop to <br />dry. Later this section was adapted to a chicken coop. This stage added chicken wire, feeding doors, ramps, <br />and roosts. I feel that is reasonable to believe that presence of the chicken wire is the only reason this <br />outside wall has not completely collapsed. Reference Figure 7. <br />-The roof trusses are failing as vertical supports have been recently added to hold up the roof structure. <br />Reference Figure 9. <br />-The plywood over joist floor has failed. I stepped right through to the dirt floor underneath when I walked <br />through this section. Reference Figure 8. <br />-The wall in between this and the next section is an addition wall that is framed and on a combination of <br />brick and toward the rear a cement curb. There is dry rot and termite damage along the entire bottom of this <br />wall. Reference Figure 10. <br />Northern half of corn crib structure <br />-This section was enclosed with a front door, windows, and rear overhead garage door. <br />-A concrete floor was added later as well as a curb along the bottom of both east -west walls. <br />-The roof on the northern part has holes with bad deck and rotten trusses. Reference Figure 11. <br />-This small section of roof is receiving the brunt of all the elements that run off the southern roof of the <br />large shop area. A pitch/storage area was added to perhaps divert this load, but it has weakened the roof and <br />the wall supports. <br />-There is a wall for the middle section that is inches away from the wall that is the southern wall of the <br />large shop section. Termites and water have damaged the wall to the point where additional supports had to <br />be added to help hold up the roof in this section. Reference Figure 8, left frame. <br />This building will continue to deteriorate if it is not separated from the rest of the structure. It is not structurally <br />strong enough to hold its own weight let alone strong enough to support the weight of the elements from the shop <br />roof. The roofs and walls need to be rebuilt separately with truss supports, floors, and proper gutters. The structure <br />is not safe and will not likely survive a serious winter as it sits. <br />Steve Szaday <br />Preservation Inspector <br />GROUP B STANDARDS: LOCAL LANDMARKS: <br />A. Maintenance <br />The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and <br />upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. <br />B. Treatment <br />Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re- <br />roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. <br />A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it <br />significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of <br />Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the <br />original surfaces. <br />C. Renovation and Additions <br />Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A <br />modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to • <br />landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. <br />Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, <br />materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the <br />following: <br />