June 2018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has • been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Written by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Molnar made a motion to deny COA 92018-0427. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. Vice President Hertel clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered. Commissioner Molnar (AYE): I vote in the affirmative in the motion to deny the application due to the applicant not being present and due to concern of how the front of the structure would look • with mismatched windows. Commissioner Gordon (AYE): I vote in the affirmative in the motion to deny this application for the same reasons as previously stated. Commissioner Hertel (AYE): I vote in the affirmative in the motion to deny this application due to the applicant not being present and unable to answer our questions and the inconsistency with the historical accuracy if they were to be removing these windows. Commissioner Anderson (AYE): I vote in the affirmative in the motion to deny the application due to lack of representation; I also would like to see the applicant to work with staff for the retroactive approval or denial of the windows that were put in and to work together to continue the preservation of this structure and its architectural integrity. Commissioner Bonham (AYE): I vote in the affirmative in the motion to deny the application for the reasons previously stated. Commissioner Canada (AYE): I vote in the affirmative in the motion to deny the application due to the applicant not being present, and would like to see the applicant match the original windows. Commissioner Fisher (AYE): I vote in the affirmative in the motion'to deny the application due to the style of the replacement windows not being reflective of the original style. Seven in favor, zero opposed. . Vote: 7 — 0. Motion to deny COA #2018-0427 is passed.