September 2017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Although only one sign has been installed to date, approval has previously been given for installation of two Centier Bank signs on the structure. The sign proposed in this application will be in addition to, not in place of, the previously approved signage. Three signs would violate the Group B standards which specifically state "Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business." Additionally, staff believes this sign will have limited visibility from the east due to nearby structures. Staff recommends denial. Written by Deb Parcell Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel Executive Director Staff clarified that two signs have been installed to date. Commissioner Gordon moved to deny application on the grounds that it does not fit into the guidelines and it would detract from designation as a landmarked building. Seconded by Commissioner Gelfman. No further discussion. President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered. Commissioner Anderson (AYE) — Commission has already created those allowances for two signs rather than just one and believe that we have to ensure that we are not setting a precedent for others to have their signs on the building and detract from the historical nature of the structure. Commissioner Gordon (AYE) — It is outside the guidelines for this landmark location. Commissioner Klusczinski (AYE) — Primarily is that it is not in keeping with Group B standards as they are written right now. Even before the exception could be considered, I believe the commission should have a comprehensive plan from building owner or developer. Commissioner Gelfman (AYE) — Vote to deny on basis of our guidelines and setting a precedent for more than two signs which is already over the amount we normally allow. Commissioner Molanr (NAY) Vote: 4 —1 COA 2017-0803 Denied 3