March 2017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Klusczinski documented the discarded windows, inspected the remaining original windows (not yet removed), and condition of sills; pointed out failure to apply for COA or Building Permit, and non-compliance of vinyl windows with standards and guidelines. (see attached report). Written request to Building Commissioner to issue a Cease and Desist order. (see attached letter). October 12, 2016: HPC staff meeting and conference call with Todd Zeiger of Indiana Landmarks regarding recent vinyl window installation. Indiana Landmarks holds a fagade easement on Tippecanoe Place. It was determined that the removed windows are circa -1980. President Klusczinski drafted a letter of notification of violation of Group B Standards for property owner. (see attached letter). October 18, 2016: Indiana Landmarks notified property owner of violation of their Historic Preservation Easement. (see attached letter). October 19, 2016: Building Department issues Cease and Desist Letter. (see attached letter). January 26, 2017: Building Department issues Ordinance Violation Citation. (see attached) Project: Existing 6- and 3 -light casement and fixed wood windows were removed from previously approved enclosed porch on back side of property. These windows were approved as part of COA 1980-0219 to (Appendix I, item 10): "The rear garden veranda will be enclosed with three casement windows per bay, with heavy wood frames designed to fit around the columns." Windows have been replaced with Andersen American Craftsman 70 -Series Pro vinyl double -hung 1/1 replacement windows. Window openings have been reduced in size and the style deviates from what was previously approved. A solid wood frame is proposed to cover all vinyl on the exterior. The wood frame appears similar to a storm window, however, there is no glazing. Wood frame will be attached to vinyl windows by screws and caulked. An opening at the bottom is intended to allow water to escape. Not part of the application, a door with transom above in the rear veranda has been replaced. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On February 17, 2017 at approximately LOAM Director Feasel and I visited the property located at 620 W Washington. There we met with Kevin the manager of the restaurant housed within the structure. We were on site to document the window installation at the rear enclosed porch. We were told that the wood used under the windows above the limestone was pressure treated pine. We were also told that cedar was used in between the windows. The transition pieces between the windows were the same ones that existed with the last window installation but had been stripped and repainted. The new windows appeared to be vinyl replacements. There appeared to be some installation issues. -The original transition pieces were set too far away from the limestone columns and foam sealant was installed to fill the void, in most places at least 1 inch on all sides. -The windows themselves were framed incorrectly as the outsides of the windows are clearly visible with at least % inch of gap between the window and the framework all around -Foam sealant was used around all the new framework in lieu of the proper caulking. The transitions be flexible not brittle after freezing. Wood and limestone expand and contract at different rates and therefore need a pliable transition material. Some original transition material was still present and appeared to be a type of rubberized caulk. -Some new caulking beads were well over V2 inch wide and stood % inch above grade We also noticed a new transom above the new screen door to the porch. The original transom window and framework were left by the dumpster and were photographed. The window was not deteriorated beyond repair. Steve Szaday STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. n