August 2017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Print I Close Window Subject: COA 2017-0807A From: "Elicia Feasel" <efeasel@co.st joseph.tn.us> Date: Thu, Aug 10, 2017 3:04 pm To: <tnfo@bernardos.com> Cc: "Debra Parcell" <DPar'cell@co.st joseph.in.us>, <bryheath5@gmail.com> Attach: COAApplication.pdf E Bemardo, r i It is obvious that you are motivated and have a strong interest in spurring further redevelopment in the immediate area by the improvements you propose to make at 315 Madison. I can assure you that HPC Staff is doing our best to convey your projects accurately and with adequate detail for the Commission to render its decision. In drafting the Staff Report for COA 2017-0807A (the current application) and finalizing Staff Approvals from COA 2017-0706 (following the conditional approval); we are not clear on many points where there are inconsistencies between the application jtems and site plan, or that more detail is needed. It is the Historic Preservation Commission's policy not to add -- applications that do not include complete documentation to the public hearing agendas (see attached, pgs 2-q and i htto://sjcindiana.com/777/COA-Form ). After deliberating the details that are inconsistent and/or missing, I am willing to :. include this application on the August 21 agenda set for the board but must receive the necessary documentation/clarity by August 16 at 8:30 am (prior to the public posting of the agenda). Please see below for list of needed documentation (either to clarify discrepancies or to provide needed specifications): 1. Windows -Proposed states, "Anderson 200 Series". Product specification provided is for Crestline. Please confirm which is being applied for. -Approval was previously giver' to replace windows that match the size of the current openings, Proposed large picture window with two windows. Please specify size of two new double -hung windows: Will there b&a,mullpn'(trim piece) in - between the two windows? 2. Garage -Proposed states, "extend the roof over a new 6' porch on the west side.." Site plan depicts a V-10' single slope covered porch on south side. Please confirm which is being applied for. If south side is proposed, an elevation is required, particularly to convey the roof extension. -Please confirm that the south facing windows remain in their existing location with door in between; if new location of windows is proposed, please include on elevation. -Staff is assuming that the half round window above existing garage door will be retained; please advise if other alternative is proposed. 3. Fencing -Proposed states, "Sierra _Pacific 8' Dog -Eared Cedar Fence Picket, to be constructed with treated 2x4, 4x4 posts and two swinging gates of.the same construction". COA 2017-0706 approved fence under following condition: 6' wood privacy fence ! on east, west, and north sides; fence on south side to be less than 6' tall in a style with spaces between the pickets. Site plan notes 6' Richmond WHITE VINYL privacy fence on east and north sides, 8' dog eared fence on west side, 4' open white picket -vinyl fenc,eronsouth sid�A entry gate is shown on site plan on east and south sides. The proposed is not qualified for staff approval as the material has been substituted from wood (previously approved) to vinyl and west fence is proposed 2' taller than approved. As such, this application item requires board review. Please provide product specification and photograph of Richmond white vinyl fence, both privacy and open picket. Please provide an elevation of south fence design. 4. Alley Entry i -Please provide elevation to convey the alterations. at is p oposed de and stair material? What is the proposed railing material, design, and height?— ur r� � , f C 5. Second story entrance %� 14 �''�'�, -Design on site plan is good. What is proposed deck and stair riatteerial? What is the proposed railing material, design, and height? Please let me know if you have any questions. ThanksM Elicia 1 of 2 8/10/17,4:10 P: